Search results for query: *

3 interchange + 2 substitutes looks to be the best option IMO. People complaining about the changes seem to forget that in the past there was just a 19th man, who was a substitute.

I hope the basket is still okay...

Whoosh... the blindness is unsurprising, it's occurred many times before...

Back away, change the topic to a favourite lament, ah... that's better...

The point I made is the same Roubini made: “Well honestly, it’s George Bush’s fault,” he says. In his view, Bush cut taxes, “we spent $2 trillion for two unwinnable wars, we doubled discretionary spending,” we increased entitlement spending through Medicare Part D and we took a...

Give up Meds - Roubini clearly understands this better than you.

I will side with Nouriel Roubini over you, as will most.

Yes, and it definitely affected birth rates. As it happened it was also seen as possibly affecting teenage pregnancies, which they were not comfortable with (hence the baby bonus was split into multiple payments).

"Proof" LOL. This place is like primary school... There was quite a bit of discussion about it. For example, http://www.medindia.net/news/Baby-Bonus-Leads-to-Baby-Boom-in-Australia-but-Teen-Pregnancies-too-Rise-48113-1.htm...

People in Australia became pregnant for the baby bonus and other benefits, so not surprising.

Seems Roubini agrees with me. “Well honestly, it’s George Bush’s fault,” he says. In his view, Bush cut taxes, “we spent $2 trillion for two unwinnable wars, we doubled discretionary spending,” we increased entitlement spending through Medicare Part D and we took a deregulatory approach to...

Neither are you. You'd like to see more of this: And this:

Clearly Australia has failed to invest sufficiently in education judging by the above posts...

What a ****ing stupid post.

Clearly quite a number of greedy idiots got caught up in the herd mentality of getting free stuff. Only a fool would think that this - taking a bottle of wine - was typical of the violent crowd and the initial perpetrators. Picking out these isolated examples as representative of the group is...

Except it makes little economic sense. :)

I hace criticised the US, but your reading of that is as selective as your reading of history. Nazi Germany also did not conduct wars half way across the world. So somehow killing neighbours is not so bad...? Carry on with your uneducated ranting...

Suggesting the US is not Nazi Germany is unfairly defending them now is it? Such strident criticisms need to be kept in historical context.

That's really quite silly.

http://on.wsj.com/nyO5nA

LOL that will keep you occupied for a while! :) For my part I will acknowledge a mea culpa on the early comments.

It was an observation about your comment, not you. There is a clear difference. Assuming emotions of other posters is also not such a good idea.

You should understand the rules you attempt to moderate - "idiotic comment" is not a personal attack.

I had read the article. I didn't focus on just those two sentences you did, but rather on the key points. I did not have time to add a summary or view at the time, but thought it was interesting for others to read, given comments about causes. Neither I nor the article said they were the sole...

And arguing it like a ********, so it's not surprising BF is the way it is. The point in the article was that most of the damage and violence was caused by certain people.

**** *** ********!

He is clearly implying that comments about youths were incorrect because the perpetrators were older. Obviously idiotic because many of those involved were youths and many were criminal gangs, and a few other types does not change that. But he's incapable of making an argument, instead...

Idiotic comment, unsurprisingly.

It's difficult for them to do both in such situations.

They have them on stand-by.