Search results for query: *

Haha hashtags now. Still one of the Bay's most formidable posters I see. Never change MJ

Well then this must be where I tell you the difference between possibilities and actuals.

Eliminated without firing a shot in the first week perhaps .

Clean the cut up above ya eye Selwood you look at me w***er. The match finished 45 minutes ago.

Home and Away Specialists yet again. 4 goals to the 20 minute mark of the last quarter in perfect conditions. One of the more embarassing final performances i can remember.

You called?

Who else thinks Hutchy could do a great Uncle Fester impersonation?

Apparently during the raid they finally found Thompson’s Plan ‘B’ for the 2008 Grand Final. It was behind the couch the whole time.

Aha..but we're in the bay. Prone to exaggeration and all that. You new around here or somethink? :rolleyes:

Full of talent as we know. In short - a coach with a questionable game plan which has consistently failed this season when the heat was on. Effort and resilience of the playing group doesn't equal their talent. 14 wins, a % of below 115 and two heavy finals losses. It's a fail from me, Chef.

I also heard after Round 23 you predicted Dusty Martin would win Charlie and also that the weather was on the improve. You're on fire!!

Adelaide by 35pts First Goalkicker: Tom Lynch Normie: Matt Crouch

It's how I roll in the Bay! :p

No seriously. Your OP is embarrassing. You denigrate the great, late Maurice Rioli coz clearly you have NFI about the history of our great game. Did you even know there's been Rioli's prior to Cyril? :drunk: You're also of the opinion that this shitful 2017 GWS side are better than the 2015...

Steven Motlop could've kicked 4 goals tonight. Together with your shithouse mob, GWS are one of the worst top four teams in living memory.

You thought wrong, flog.

Keep digging that hole, s**t for brains.

Having to wait five months to bump thread = massive fail Which West Ciast player should've won it, MJ?

Chris Scott also believed Waite and Koby Stevens tackles from earlier in the year didn't warrant suspension. Lol

Haha...Bringing up an incident from close to 5 seasons back. Perhaps under today's rules Hodge may've been in trouble. Iirc it was almost unanimously agreed his bump was perfectly executed and Murphy's technique left himself exposed. Anyway hardly apples with apples. Bring up a similar tackle...

Easy to spot a piss ant, know nothing poster when they need to bring up the team I support. :thumbsu:

Of course not....the circumstances surrounding the concussion needs to be investigated. The rules of the game surrounding rough conduct - dangerous tackles (arms pinned - head hits the turf) suggest your boy's in trouble unfortunately.

Not the case....Helmets don't protect you from concussion.

You new to AFL? The head must be protected at all costs..surely you've seen enough examples of that over the past couple of seasons.

2017 laws of the game-rough conduct dangerous tackles - when tackling players should not lift, sling, rotate or drive their opponents into the ground with excessive force, resulting in the head region being left in a vulnerable position. The force and momentum of Dangerfield's tackle brought...

An interwebz Elephant Stamp for you. 2000HP sums it up nicely.

Kreuzer's momentum from being tackled. Right? And why did "his head hit the ground first"? Why didn't the big galoot put out his arms to save his noggin? Any ideas? Anyone?

Irrelevant...a dangerous tackle is a dangerous tackle whether the tackler believes his opponent has the ball or not.

Suse?

Hopefully Chick, Fletch and Cuz didn't invite the lil un's on a trip to Vegas.