Search results for query: *

We have had a soft run but 20% of the sample size in both examples is because Geelong won / Geelong opponents lost and North lost / North's opponents won so it is a little self fulfilling at this early stage of the season.

Surely you just pay the point without wasting 5 minutes given the context of the game.

Um, of course it would. It would be connected to a live feed from champion data at a minimum.

Gave up quicker than the Eagles. Change of direction in the wet against unfit security would have been lulz for everyone.

Geelong will ease off if they have a big break at 3 quarter time. 5 day break to next game.

Bruce was a horse racing caller

Wait and see if anyone has a big friday night I guess :think:

And the fixture is not even a surprise. When we said we would bounce this year pre season because we get a full pre season and a good fixture based upon not making the finals last year it was dismissed and we were Max Gawn. Now we have used the fixture of a team that finished 12th last year...

Venue makes all the difference in this match up. I'd expect Adelaide to win but it is a good test for Geelong. If we can win it, it would be huge in the context of the season. Only have to jag a couple of these type of games over the season to make the finals when you factor in the KP games and...

Ego to be the match winner more than a lack of footy IQ. He kicked it and it is a results based world.

Agreed. How many of Port's outs would be in their best half dozen players? Those 3 are for Geelong. Equal 1st, 2nd and 3rd in the B&F for a premiership team last year.

Probably defending Port's finals record here while using it to s**t all over Hinkley on the port board.

The road sucks for the perma road works. Not sure where you live to call it congested lol. If you got to Hobart in peak hour maybe but Launceston to at least Bridgewater you'd never ever have congestion issues.

If WC can't physically field a team, what would happen? Would the AFL give special dispensation to play someone from North Launceston or whatever....

It is 2003. Only won in Geelong 3 times since they came into the competition. Brutal. Some decent loss streaks at KP. Adelaide surprises me though to be honest as outside the last couple of years they have been competitive for the whole time period unlike a couple of those other sides...

First time since the 1800s that three Ned's have played in a game of footy

Who did Matty Knights run with when he was at Essendon? Edit: It was Cale Hooker and Nathan Lovett Murray lol

About time they come down to Geelong I think.

Who is missing from Essendon's team?

Pretty sure we have a s**t hot record off 5 day breaks including one that was to Perth earlier in the year. I don't think it is the big deal that people make it out to be.

The 7th to whatever teams are all hopeless so Richmond could still make it even if we beat you so doesn't come into my thinking at all

I know you are trolling but there is not going to be any fallout for a team that would drop from 3rd to.......oh, 3rd on the ladder with a loss. With two Melbourne teams 1 & 2 makes no difference really as finals in Melbourne regardless.

Umpires can't catch a break. As fans as a whole we cry out to just let the players play yet when they do that it is all about every free kick they missed. St Kilda fans should be more worried about their marquee key forward being John Butcher II.

We say the same about the bottom team every year and they find a way. Do they get to play the Eagles in Tassie? :rainbow:

Personally I think the fact that we are playing average and there are a few players down and or under pressure is the reason they will put the skis on and give them a good old hiding.

We don't have a fit ruckman with Stanley, Ratugolea and Fort all injured. Duncan is missing. Then just your fringe players like Simpson, Dahlhaus etc. So reasonably close to full strength.

Who is missing from Essendon's team? Hurley, who else

I was on the fence when we picked him up to be honest. Sort of player you have to watch week in and week out to appreciate I think. He almost suffers from originally being a top draft pick as people expect more. From an athletic perspective he'd be pretty close to Danger. He is just not that...

I don't know, the bottom 6 or so players of their grand final teams in the early 00s, Mick was a genius getting those spuds so close.

TBF she has panels on Gilbert McAdam. Jesus ******* christ.