Well rubbish decision by umps but certainly not the first or the last , so it's on the players to move on from bad decisions. Been that way for a very long time
Probably more to do with the first 3 quarters where Freo dominated pretty much all main stats yet were only in front by 1, then 2, then 7 at each break. I felt they should have been 5 goals in front Carlton were that far off in clearances and uncontested possessions.
What you have stated is full of innuendo. Unless both parties come out and confirm what was said, we will all be none the wiser.
We don't know what warnings any players got during the match concerning borderline dissent - maybe , just maybe , player concerned received prior warnings?
End of...
Was the Cottrell mark touched - yes indeed
Was the one before it touched - yes indeed
Is the dissent rule fair - no indeed
Did Carlton get the W - yes indeed
Go tell your sob stories to people who actually care
I would honestly like to hear what the umpire had to say, and the player as well in a review type of situation. I bet my bottom $$$ that players would STFU forever more
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.