Search results for query: *

Do the Dees even have medium blue shorts?

Really messy. It is the dark backs and white number that make this Hard to watch

It was yellow for a while in the 90s. This year’s brown is definitely on the maroon side unfortunately.

Will be interesting to see what colour combos they come up with.

Have the Giants officially changed from charcoal to black?

Strange that we announced we would wear the gold + V for all non MCG away games, yet only wore it one. Would not have helped the clash tonight though.

And that is a total flip from 2015.

Gold stripes would be Hawthorn, yeah? Strange idea.

https://www.google.com.au/search?q=hawthron+pink+jumper&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en-au&client=safari#imgrc=v6qerdlCWlqjHM: Horrible

Who knows? I would suggest more jumpers = less profits

How would wearing white incease revneue. At best we would sell an extra 50 white kids’ tops. We get around $5 per top. That is $250. Sell a few direct, say another $250. Wowee.

Mother’s Day Sunday.

Reckon those number refer to the graphic not the jumper. Last week we had the brown graphic v Tigers.

You asked why have one if they don’t wear it. They will wear it when there is a clash (GWS).

He never said he was the sole reason. You are being a bully. Of course clubs and manufacturers do market research.

Why wear it if there is no clash?

Hawks usually in all brown away v Cats.

Agree a list is needed. If clubs are not happy they need to work with the AFL to find a jumper that works. Or work with the other club. I.e. Hawks could say to GWS, if we ever meet in a GF you can wear your home jumper with white shorts and we will wear our brown away with brown shirts. Clash is...

There were three or four others also in all navy socks. Weird.

Well we will just have to disagree then. I find it hard to watch when one of the 50 or so jumper clashes is on, but this is not one of them. What part of the two jumpers confuses you? It is the bright gold that pops that you can't tell from the white? Did you watch the game or are you just...

Disagree. No clash at all.

Sure, but thread is about the worst ever jumper clashes and there is no clash at all between either Hawthorn jumper and Collingwood.

Is it a clash on TV? Certainly at the game it is nowhere near a clash as the gold is very prominent and cuts through. The front is mainly gold.

The club announced last year that the AFL said we needed a white jumper for GWS, Crows and WC. We wore it v Suns just for the hell of it (we don't play GWS or WC away). Gold or white shorts with home would be fine except v GWS.

Hawks to (unneccessarily) don the new white number.

North a stretching it a bit to claim they are the same club as the North Melbourne that formed in 1869 and folded in 1876. A bit like how Hawthorn used to claim they were founded in 1873, but deeper research showed that the original hawthorn club folded and the Hawthorn we know today was formed...

Unless then ditch the white with blue stripes, just away V Pies.

Love the Pies 50/50 b/w jumper. Perfect with black or white shorts. We should also bring back our 50/50 brown/gold jumper from the 50s/60s. The way they weee intended to look.

We did a deal in the late 1980s to avoid white shorts. It involved all gold socks. Us and the Swans were considered to have medium colours, and an opposition in dark shorts or white shorts = no clash and we could wear our brown or Swans their red shorts.

So more Gold clashes less? The brown works best. Don't think this was a mandated clash. Club announced before fixture came out our manadate clauses were GWS (fair enough), Crows and Eagles (neither are bad clashes). We only drew one of those away, so my understanding is that they chose to wear...