Search results for query: *

Our injury list claims are generally completely untrustworthy. Unless they are in the final presented to the AFL just before the game I assume they are still injured.

Feel like I wasnt far off with this prediction. We shall see with Day this weekend.

You keep paying $700k or whatever he's on? Sunk costs are a thing too.

Where was the ball 94% of the time ?

If they can play every game they only need to be 70% as good. Which is what, 1.5 goals a game ?

We need KPP who can play every week. Having the best player in the comp for 13 or 14 games a year vs a very good player 23 games a year I take the latter.

He was on the field regularly before his injury and subsequent injury recurrance and has been on the field since returning. Lewis is always getting injured. There is a massive difference.

What does he offer a developing team ? Moral support from the sidelines ? Leadership with the rehab group ? In 7 seasons he hasnt gone more than 15 games. If he was the tip of the spear at another team we would be mocking them.

I doubt anyone would offer more than a 3rd round so it wouldnt be worth bothering. If we got a low 20 offer and he was happy to leave we should take it.

6 games last year kicked more than 2 goals. And we are paying him I assume $650k to $700k or possibly more. Hopefully low base and large match payments. Of the top 25 goal kickers last year only one played fewer than 20 games. It wasnt Lewis. He simply is not the guy you want to spearhead a...

So for half the season he kicked 2 + goals. I think that makes my point, thanks.

How does Lewis help us develop our young players. He has zero consistency in both being able to get on the park and to kick goals when playing. If another club was silly enough to make a serious offer we should take it.

Tackles plus double digit possessions doesnt suit our current game plan.

Having played 50 games on that ground youd think hed know how to take a mark.

6 defenders and none can knock it over the line. We are Collingwood the year they tanked for Naicos. But who are we getting in the Draft ?

Has has to compete in the air against someone 15cm taller. Finn marked over the top of Chol then.

After Chol our tallest forward is 180cm.

King 10m on his own in their F50. That is so lazy of our defenders.

There is still a chance that Wingard is the 1st of our injured players to play.

Could we get Butler to play? He may be tired but would definitely not be our worst forward...

He's on the case.

The HRC wont make a finding of proof, will it? Usually the next step if sides wont come to an agreement is for it to go to court. That is when the HRC opinion gets tested. That said, would be good to know how often courts land the opposite side of the HRC findings.

One bad error in 2 games is a record for Frost. We are not playing badly because of him. Our midfield is struggling and we are missing goals we should be getting.

Chol is running hard and wanting the ball. That has always been his only flaw. If he can keep that up while we build he will be a steal.

Worpel has stepped up. He is shining with full time mid work.

4 days later....

Yep. The over/under was about age 26. Everyone over played poorly, everyone under played well - excpet Lewis and maybe Reeves.

With Finn on the bench for more than 3 quarters of the game.

He was taking marks on Ginnivan. Our entries to F50 were bad and our kicking for goal was atrocious. Lets wait and see how McKay goes against an average team.

A week of set shot practice please Sam.