Search results for query: *

Still. The best you’ve got?

I can only hope it’s alcohol. You seem obsessed. You’re not equipped to play in the field. Your responses are incoherent. It isn’t anything harder is it? Maybe just don’t respond to me if you don’t have anything useful to add beyond insults. Mod edit: Seeing as it somehow needs to be said...

Righto Maggie. Time for another sherry.

That’s a lie? That’s the best you can do? Seriously?

Seen plenty of her stuff. Not seen a lie. Happy to stand corrected. Put them up. But well done on derailing it away from Biden and his long list of verifiable bullshit.

Right. Four responses. No examples of lies. Standard. 🙄

What lies? PS: I don’t think she made the video.

Reminds me of Albo and his West Wing embarrassment.

“People like him…” PS: *hear

Geez you should be able to dig out a bunch of posts to support that.* *Distinguishing between what’s true and what’s not true is not being a “(continuous) Trump defender”.

Alibi for the big guy. A couple of errors. 🤣

It would be convenient I'm sure if everybody fit into nice little packages so you wouldn't have to consider the complexity of humanity but they don't. Don't be lazy.

Now Maggie, read this carefully because every word matters. Joe Biden is, right now, the most important person in US politics. BruceFromBalnarring is just another flog with an opinion on the internet. If you can't distinguish between the two as regards their relevance to the subject matter of...

Trump isn't the President.

Not a Trump supporter......but anyway.

Except I wasn’t judging his character. More his behaviour. Specifically, bullshitting about his academic record. Which is what Joe Biden did. You seem obsessed with me, GP. I’m not the subject of this thread. Why do you keep responding to me with personal attacks?

This Santos bloke seems like he has all the credentials to be a Democrat presidential candidate.

Read the Judgment

Of course it wasn’t.

Yeah, particularly by progressives. I'm not surprised by it. I'm simply correcting it. As acknowledged by the judge, there WAS evidence of voter disenfranchisement, just not enough specificity as to intent and not enough proof as to how many. There WAS evidence that machines had been messed...

I didn't imply it. The judge said it. Noting that I was responding to a suggestion of "no evidence". But that doesn't go close to "pretending Kari won".

No. I have never made a political donation of any kind. Why are you supporting your moderator in his effort to derail the thread?

There you go again. Where did I say (or imply, or pretend) Kari didn't lose her court case? Why do you do this?

But you don't even do that. You offer no argument whatsoever. You produce no counterpoint. Just nothing but insults and verbals.

Again. Why? What's your actual purpose here? I don't think I have ever seen you post anything remotely useful.

Why do you do this? Seriously.

Maybe. But that’s heading into “cooker” territory.

$34k in legal costs. 🤭

No you haven’t. I dare say you haven’t read it or, if you have, you’re happily lying about what it says.