Search results for query: *

Prima facie example right there. Thanks for illustrating the point

An appendectomy is a life of death procedure an abortion is elective surgery.

You recycle a 6 year old tweet. What’s your point?

No, of course nothing at all. Only the FBI and CIA memorandums.

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/russia-hoax-lie-hillary-clinton-gregg-jarrett Expect this to be the start of the end for the Democrat campaign for 2020.

It’s all about the science at the end of the day. When does a human life start? Birth, conception? 27 weeks? We need more peer reviewed studies and when we get to that magical 97% it will be settled and hopefully the debate finishes.

Trump and Co are geniuses. Expect some bed ridden photos over the next week and the media to hang on every thread all while gaining sympathy and restricting negative ad campaigns. After a fortnight, Trump will rise like Lazarus and hold rallies with huge turnouts and power towards a landslide...

How many times does one person need to condemn racism?

It’s simple to comply, but he doesn’t have to and he won’t be compelled to so get over it.

Why doesn’t he comply? I can’t tell you why he doesn’t but I can tell you that he doesn’t have to. If it was a criminal investigation he might provide it but it’s a civil defamation case where the burden of proof is on the balance of probabilities as opposed to beyond reasonable doubt. DNA on...

You clearly have don’t know what you’re talking about. You’re referring to the chain of custody of an evidentiary DNA exhibit which doesn’t apply to a covert sample. The evidentiary sample is the court ordered DNA sample. A covert sample is taken during the investigation phase and is not...

Legal to do what? Get a court ordered DNA warrant?

The Process is: - take a covert sample from the suspect. - get it tested for a match against the sample taken off the victim - if there’s a match then a court ordered DNA warrant is sought compelling said suspect to provide it. If this hasn’t been done then the FBI have conducted a poor...

What are you implying here? That you can write-off sexual assault settlements as tax deductible? Of course he can be arrested for committing fraud. The IRS are already aware of his income and the tax he’s paid, privacy laws prevent public release. If there was fraud detected he would have...

You’ve made a statement that police should consider underlying causing when policing ‘crime’. Did you not? Or do I need to repost it for you. If a crime is detected it is acted upon by arrest or use of discretion e.g a warning. How else do police deal with ‘crime’?

Agree mate

Are you referring to the use of police discretion when assessing a course of action? If not, please provide us an example of a situation of how a police officer should act by “considering the underlying cause of crime” before choosing his course of action after detecting a crime. Then expand...

Correct. I believe the underlying causes of crime have nothing to do with how crime should be policed. By all means it should be a mitigating circumstance in sentencing, hence why the First Step Act is a great thing.

It’s not ‘over policing’. A reduction in crime is a good thing. Identifying crime is over policing? The only bias used with this strategy is bias towards people’s criminal history. Are you saying if police have the same amount of interactions with white vs black the level of criminal...

I don’t really get your point. Who is saying that proactive policing is “race neutral”? It’s a crime reduction strategy based on current crime levels and intelligence, not race based targeting.

On the bolded point. I can see how you’re trying to interpret it but you’re wrong. It is not fundamentally racist. A certain zone is proactively policed on the back of crime statistics and intelligence. If those areas of high crime contain minorities it is a sad fact but it is not racist. On...

How do you measure treatment by the legal system? Are you referring to punishment black person vs white person for committing the same crime? As for ‘over targeting’ minorities, this is proactive policing 101. Target high crime areas with an overt presence as well as target recent prison...

What about a town sniper as well?

120 million deaths in the USA alone. Get your stats updated.

The Mick Fs of this world?

Biden in the biggest landslide victory since Roosevelt in 36. 22nd amendment to be reverted and Biden to finish his 3rd term as president on his 90th Birthday on 20/11/2032

Surely a rhetorical question. The Australian public have handled it well with good messaging and leadership at State and Federal level. I can’t comment about US leadership at state level, maybe you can provide more? Trumps leadership on the issue has been sh1t.