Search results for query: *

Seems like BS to me. Health professional would have broken confidentiality. But it seems to me that Crowley mostly taking methadone to get off something.

CAS decision can only be challenged in the Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland. This may bankrupt the club.

http://www.businessinsider.com.au/11-signs-someone-is-lying-2014-4#now-find-out-which-ceos-america-loves-most-12

8(B) The Tribunal is comfortably satisfied that the former support person violated clause 11.7 of the AFL Code by attempting to traffick in, by selling, giving, transporting, sending, delivering and/or distributing to a third party or parties, namely the Essendon Football Club and athletes of...

Seriously, you believe what you are saying. Reimers claimed that the playing group knew that the substance they were taking were borderline but just on the legal side. Mr Dick Head McVeigh said that Reimers was lying.

Armstrong

No, McVeigh tried to discredit Reimers claims that they knew what they were taking and what they were taking was borderline. Dank thought that the drugs were not banned, but they were. McVeigh is a s**t person and a liar.

The Essendon has admitted that they did not know what the players were taking and didn't have the reporting systems to prevent any harmful chemical being taken by a player. They broke duty of care and that can be out for a player. Essendon maybe found not guilty of taking anything illegal but...

Essendon broke the rule that all supplements taken by players must be documented. Therefore, they cheated.

Essendon wins case but lose Anzac day and play the most 6 days breaks of any team.

Its players responsibility to know what they are taking and if it is banned. Players can banned for taking cough medicine.

1. Essendon have no records of what the players took and nor did it tried to make such reports. 2. Injections were done away from the club. Seems to me that Essendon as club could be blamed for lack of goverance.