Search results for query: *

No it isn't. It is how you perceive it.

You're right - it probably doesn't have Judd.

You think carlton haven't had enough #1 picks? I'd be happy for them to have several more.

"Pro Hirdies" been camped out on the front lawn have they? Those bastards

Your post needs nil further.

Yeah thats ok i will. How are the membership numbers dwindling?

They just weren't earlier?

In which case /thread

Do you think they will? What would be the timeframe?

In which case the club has already been punished.

And the AFL haven't issued any punishment. Do you think maybe they forgot?

You are not sure what the decision is but you are clear on why it was made.

You think it was some form of clandestine punishment from the league? Your question seems to be a non sequitur.

So they've only recently arrived at the decision?

But they were happy to punish us and have corporate dividends suffer for governance, so there's holes in your story.

Why do you think this is?

Need is not the correct word. So Hird was stitched up and the club has been absolved?

So Gillon is just a new small player, part of a commission that intends to control the game for the purposes of destroying it across the country? Yes, but the fines and the draft picks damaged revenue by damaging Essendon. Why impose sanctions for governance, but then baulk at imposing...

but you subscribe to "The Hird's" version of events? The conspiracy was arranged early on by one Andrew Demetriou?

They must have known it would affect revenue, so it goes against the theory the AFL would conspire to subvert the laws and spirit of the game for the purposes of not affecting revenue?

So why hand out the governance penalties, given they must have believed it would damage their revenue?

The same could be said of Carlton which hasn't recovered from the salary cap sanctions. Was it turning a blind eye to tanking? Why is there a league conspiracy to assist Essendon and yet other clubs have never received this favourable treatment? Where was the leg up for the Crows?

You think it was for record keeping, that is the post you are ranting against?

Your cognitive ability seems very low. Why question The Donners over a position you go on to support?

You seem confused. You've attacked the poster and then supported their position?

But they haven't been punished?

You need to articulate your thoughts better and post a little more coherently.

But Demetriou left the AFL, how can he be responsible for not handing out sanctions? Your conspiracy gets crazier as it goes along

You've struggled to keep track of the conversation. Ah, the infamous "& co" the plot thickens