Search results for query: *

Couple of people saying a future first from us would need to be included in that, which is just too much. 10 and 17 for 7 and some future pick would leave our future first intact, and I don’t think we’d be able to get the player we need most (McKercher) with 4 given North’s McKay compo anyway...

Think you'd be interested in 7 for 10 and 17? Puts us into the right zone to get Darcy Wilson and means our pick 17 won't just get eaten up by a Croft bid, and means you'd have two first rounders instead of the one. Or do you think there's someone specific your team's after at 7?

KPD, outside mid, small forward.

West is ready to step into that role. We’re in a position where we’ve brought in two very high end talents without having much of a crack at the rest of the draft. Now we’re at a point of needing more late-first early-second picks to just get more well rated kids onto our list, rather than...

Can't see why we'd do that, big spend for a player who's not a need for us.

Poor bugger, best wishes to him.