Search results for query: *

No, it's not the Grand Final. And 'virtual finals' aren't finals, either.

Disagree totally. An AFL Grand Final is incredibly rare, and what some of these people dedicate their entire lives to the pursuit of (and rarely achieve). Re the bold, I agree with the 12 day protocol for the standard season; but it is 100% an arbitrary 'safety first' approach, which shouldn't...

Insanity that Randall is ruled out. 12 day rule should not apply in finals - and definitely not the Grand Final. Should be assessed on Thursday and decision made then. Imagine if Dusty or Danger missed a GF due to concussion?

They're getting into him on the radio as well; what'd he do?

I will say, I'm more interested in this, than the women's BBL, which is pretty crap. How long that interest will persist is the question.

EJ Whitten game rated it's balls off as well; it's great news, I wouldn't read too much into it.

Opals get decent coverage - unfortunately, the only games they play that matter are the Olympics and World Champs, so there isn't much opportunity to have them from and centre. Surely basketball mate?

Kinda like Freddie Flintoff and Brett Lee? ;)

Nothing wrong with appreciating beauty - in life, in nature; man or woman.

Wow, you really took that up a notch! I'm not sure if I believe you - I'm a Hetero dude, and I still note how attractive certain players are during a game.

Nobody that awesome ;)

Reported to you as being reported on 360? Sounds definitive :p The AFL has stated a lot of details are yet to be finalized. People with agendas, like a certain fanatical Tweeter who likes to pretend she's a journalist, used that as an excuse to launch a tirade. At this stage, I don't think...

A lot of the details haven't been finalized - which some morons are using as their launchpad to go on a rant. There is no way in hell an AFL competition is not going to cover the medical costs of those playing In it.

Tayla Harris is going to be the star of that competition. She's beautiful. Has that unique kicking action. And she's a gun. I am 99% sure that isn't true; some perpetually offender Twitter moron said it, and it's become fact.

Ahh, no worries then :) Ashmore and Brennan go alright too. NikkiNoo Shell vonn ams4crows is this what it's like for you guys watching the footy? Watching a chiseled, square jawed Adonis like Kyle Hartigan, or the boyish good looks of (pre-beard) Jimmy Bartel, or the rugged charm of a Graham...

Tayla Harris is a bit of a gun! I hope Abby plays for us.

I hadn't thought of that - and it's a very good point.

Those two are beautiful; quite a few very good looking players. The blondes kicking action is rad. And I'm not being sexist, I frequently comment on how attractive some of the guys are; like Hartigan. Which was the point I made, wasn't it? As a spectacle, it's enjoyable, and really...

Why isn't Abby playing? Did they say she wasn't listed for next year? She's great, we should get her.

One of the girls said it was a smaller footy as well? The standard is pretty ordinary mate; fun to watch, and good within context, but it's not a great game of footy.

Why are they using a smaller footy? Why isn't Abby Holmes playing? I'm really not sure about this - it's fun to watch, there are some lookers, but the standard is quite mediocre; it'll be interesting to see if the competition builds momentum, or the interest dies once the novelty wears off...

Anyone watching the ladies exhibition game?

I'd like him to expand on the opportunity more. Costs? Paid by? Intent of competition?

If the competition can't sustain itself financially, then why will it exist? If girls want to play Footy, they can; not having an elite level completion won't stop that.

Gill is such a dickhead. The actual AFL is rife with issues, a huge number of problems which need addressing, and he's bragging that a few clubs are dumb enough to want to be involved in this white elephant?

Why can't you go into specifics?

I really enjoy netball, to the point I watch it on TV and go with my Mum a couple of times a year; but I wouldn't watch men play it. It's also the biggest 'female' sport in Australia, and it's only really been able to have a professional league in the last 3-5 years.

Which disabled sports have professional, national leagues? Your suggestion above would equate to cancelling all women's AFL competitions, which no one has suggested we do.

That's a valid point, but I'd counter it by pointing out that women are already massive supporters of AFL (aren't they almost on par with men for attendance?); so the question becomes, will the WFL attract more female supporters, given its already at a very high level?

I haven't actually focused on that point; my point was that the standard will not be at SANFL level, and that the league won't be financially viable. I only responded to that point because you wouldn't give a straight answer. Give them twenty years, playing from birth, and I'd say they'd...