Search results for query: *

GWS has done the best of any team from my perspective - particularly given only one pick was an academy selection.

This order includes academy and F/S bid/picks. Pick 12 in this order has been bumped back by the selections of Mills, Hopper, Kennedy and Hipwood to become pick 16. Take out the academy selections and its still pick 12.

I don't agree with your interpretation. I expect you are going off the original draft of the rules that were published when the bidding system was announced. Since then, they have ammended some of the rules and loopholes in line with clubs concerns and the introduction of trading of future...

Depends where the player was bid on. When Carlton fans were thinking we were getting both Rice and Silvagni, we were cursing the new system which meant we would likely have to cough up a lot of points. In actuality - rice is going elsewhere and silvagni isnt rated as highly as he would have been...

It would downgrade our second next year for the points we couldnt make up using picks 59 and 60 For illustrative purposes: Essendon bid pick 24 = 785 points Discount as pick is after pick 18 = 197 points Carlton must find 588 points (785 - 197) Carlton have picks 59 and 60 - worth 158 and 146...

If Carlton get Harry McKay and Ben is rated as an early second, I wouldn't be shocked to see them reach and take him with 19. Would be wrapped to walk away from the draft with Weitering, the two McKays, Mathieson and Silvagni. Build up the tall stocks this year, then take a couple more mids...

And thats saying something, because Jack R isnt always shining example of appropriate attitude on field.

giving up =/= giving