Search results for query: *

Blatant throws from other teams have been posted here but a blind eye is being turned to those ... 5 in 15 seconds. But nah, just the dogs

Brisbane picked up Dunkley to become another rugby team in Queensland

I don't claim conspiracies. I'm not a Richmond supporter. are you one of those who stupidly think the dogs are favoured by the umpires? Maybe you should look at the freekick ladder for this year and then look down the bottom. Montagna is a complete flog, you have less credibility for...

Your timely whinging is noted

Shall I post the clip from Sydney v Port? Idiots like you think only one team throws the ball. You're too daft to realise the AFL doesn't care because they want the ball to be constantly in motion

Supporter who supports a team with Zorko and a racist coach calling other teams dirty cheats. And probably unable to see the irony

The point is you cannot have a go at any other side when your own side does the same thing. The AFL probably doesn't care because they seem hell bent on moving the game on at speed. Move on

Ah yes, the "royal commission. The dogs have been secretly paying the AFL and the umpires under the table ... to sit down the bottom of the free kick differential table. Trust a Sydney supporter to be a brainless nuffy

Not very bright are you

You don't think it's ironic you're here in a bulldogs thread having a go at the dogs for throwing when your own team is shown in a small clip throwing it 4 times? Guess it doesn't matter when it's your own team huh

Your own team featured pretty heavily here

Just the dogs ... waaaaah

We need a roll eyes reaction for dumb s**t like this

You're a week early on the excuses. Every single team throws the ball each game. This isn't something you've just stumbled upon

And yet ... GC is much worse with a positive differential Moral of the story .. differentials mean diddly squat mongbean

Amusing seeing the Richmond supporters trying to tell everyone that they were the better team despite clearly being inferior for 3 quarters

It's probably a 50/50 decision. It's not an absolute howler and honestly probably makes up for the non Hannan freekick earlier in the goal square Could have been let go but it's also not a horrible decision. Can't just put the whistle away because it's late in the game. If it's there, you...

So there were some poor calls both ways in the wet... "to the conspiracy thread"

Umpiring in those conditions is difficult ... I have done it many times myself. Bound to be some mistakes. I don't think the Naughton call was one of them. McComb was 50/50, could have gone either way. The number of goals we missed from very close range (goal square, within 10 metres) should...

You're in a conspiracy thread. Shocked to see a Richmond supporter in one of those

Yet here you are whinging about umpiring You're lucky it wasn't a much bigger margin

The Naughton freekick was there you clown. The McComb one is the only one that could be called 50/50. And there were calls not made to the dogs and some dubious ones made to Richmond. Any more conspiracy theories for us? You blokes think rule changes come in to stop Richmond

Hannan tackled around the ankles in the goal square says hi

Freo player deserved to be rubbed out for headbutting Franklin's elbow, then needed to have his legs broken to teach him a lesson. AFL screwing Sydney yet again

Bet they can. On the flip side.. how do you think sydney won in 2005? No help there of course ;)

Whilst this thread is full of whingers, that's a bit cocky

Autocorrect.. but meh

If that is the case it says more about Shitney's mentality than anything else.

Yup.. beating wet toast by 8 goals must have been the umpires.. fair dinkum, give it a rest