Search results for query: *

Own Church, not own religion.

So before we start lets just go by saying that i care either way about lgbtqi+ issues and mostly think they are non issues that are completely overblown by sensationalist social and mainstream media now. I'm also not religious in any way, shape or form. Both of these things are actually...

The speed of the ball as cricket level is triple that of AFL, same with tennis. If they can get the camera's right the AFL has no excuse.

The ball had moved on, he jumped and hit a guy front on in the head. Forget about the result. It's all about intent as far as im concerned and that action is straight out a reportable offence. There is no way that action is ever not against the rules of the spirit of the game. The ridiculous...

The MRP is still ****ed. It's either an unfortunate incident where there was nothing gray could do but brace for contact or he should be going for weeks. Mcgovern received a shoulder to the head that instantly knocks him out whilst marking the ball. So either Gray goes for nothing or he saw...

Truly it's that simple in the real world. Same reason. Someone breaks into your house and attacks you and you hit them with a baseball bat and you're ****ed. Play baseball and have a ball and mitt next to where you grabbed the bat and you're right as rain.

If someone attacks you and punches you in the head and you have a reasonable reason to have a knife on you and you stab them once to defend yourself you will get off. If you're walking down the street with a knife in your hand and jump into a melee and stab someone you're going to jail.

It's how the police determine undue force. Anymore than a 1 tier escalation of violence and you get charged.

I never said i wasn't a psychopath.

I'd suggest suban deserves to be run over. In regards to the other incidents I actually agree with the OP. If you punch someone you deserve whatever you get. I'm surprised a player hasn't taken a retaliatory suspension through the courts. If someone assaults you, you are legally entitled to...

Were you the one who talked them into thinking that throwing the ball counts as a handpass?

Yes and if you're a downer this would be all that matters. * lets have a guy get knocked out in the marking contest, leave him there on the ground and let the opposition pluck the ball out of his arms after 30 seconds and play on because the timer on the scoreboard said ok. Moron.

Others might have struggled with bouncing a little bit but she had some bounces which barely reached head height. On top of this she made some horrible, horrible calls as controlling umpire in the first half (both calls made and missed). It's a pretty simple system. Employ the people who are...

Havent seen the strike so can't comment. The tackle issue is a complete load of horse s**t. He had no other option at all and executed a great tackle without malice.

Do the hawks get an extra line on the ladder to count the wins they get from the umps? They'd be 1 win (flogged us), 1 loss, 2 umpire assisted victories.

While the umpires continue to pay free kicks for s**t they can't possibly have seen i will continue to stay pissed off at them. Same goes for when they can't possibly have not seen throws and deliberate drops but let the play go on.

How about we see at least 1 iota of evidence before we consider eternal damnation for once yes?

You would know as a scouser mate.

There is a dog act category. 'bringing the game into disrepute' (not that it would be used in this instance and not that it deserves to be used either'.

I tell you when i played i was an angry man. I wouldnt have been able to let that s**t pass. Deliberate knees to the head are just not on. On principle i would have clean knocked him out and i would like to think if one of my team mates at the time saw it he would have had the s**t kicked out of...

If you looked at some of the eagles MRP decisions we get classed as intentional for pissing in the wind. Should be reckless (even though it was intentional, anything outside of play they did say would be classed that way and yes the play had moved past, it was very late), high contact, medium...

Reckless as the ball had already been disposed of, high, medium impact. If it was on someone like lindsay thomas he wouldnt have moved for a week and would be regarded as high impact. so reckless, high, medium on rough conduct plus buddys loading.

I certainly don't think it's tokenism but there were always going to be claims of it. If you wan't to talk about blatant tokenism in australian sport you need look no further than cathy freeman lighting the olympic cauldron.

She's certainly not a stunner but she has a very cute smile, dimples and a toned, athletic body. Some guys also tend to like chicks who look a bit interesting. A lot of chicks that guys think are really hot just look like complete trailer park sluts to me, even when dressed in expensive gowns...

All i can see is whinge , whinge, whinge, whinge, whinge. Best of luck chelsea, love your smile.

Just on the classification of maxwells what do people think it will be? I think reckless High contact Low impact Thats 5 activation points im not sure how that scores for rough conduct but with maxwell having no record its guaranteed to at least be a week off i would think. Because its...

Must be from kwinana, It's like frankston only less people get shot and in kwinana single mums there go alright rather than being junkies.

Well why dont we play a game, i pay for your flights to wa and then we see if you can pick the difference between me punching, headbutting, elbowing, kneeing you in the head hmmm? A head clash feels like being hit with any bony part of the body you nonce.

He was standing still ffs and just protected himself.

During the home and away season its high contact (as contact was made with the head even if it wasnt the primary contact point), reckless and medium impact totalling 6 activation points which if im not mistaken is what 2 or 3 week suspension? Furthermore he had the option to go the ball but...