Search results for query: *

North are about 2 - 3 good drafts away from having the composition of a list capable of challenging. By that stage Goldstein, Higgins, Cunnington, Ziebell, Tarrant, Macmillan, Atley, all mainstays will be gone. We need quality depth in the middle, a refresh off half back and replacements in key...

Que?

They have the option to match, yes, but that does not mean North must then engage in a trade for Gaff. North can, and will, walk away if WCE match.

North won't be trading for Gaff under any circumstances. That the club are willing to throw big coin at him does not mean that we are going after him at any cost. We are going after him with salary cap space and want him as an FA only. North have a plan and will stick to that plan over the next...

It is known.

It's GWS or North. Simples.

This is where knowledge of club becomes important. There was no way known that Scott was going to drop any senior players last year, unless they were injured. Since last year 5 mainstays of the 22 were moved on and as such more young players are getting games. Also, a numnber of young players...

Check my post and read again. First and second round draft picks 2012 - 2016. St. Kilda = 13 North = 14 Re first round picks. Since 2012 St. Kilda have had 6 with an average position of 11, North have had 5 with 14 being the average draft position. Re second round picks. Since 2012 St. Kilda...

Of those at North who are 23 or under and who have debuted the average games played is 16. This is due to pushing for a flag, so playing older players, and injury to guys like Garner, Wood and Anderson which has restricted their exposure. To be making any definitive calls on quality when there...

Players 18-21: Carlton: 15 North: 20 St. Kilda: 18 Players 22-26: Carlton: 18 North: 15 St. Kilda: 18 Players 27+: Carlton: 13 North: 9 St. Kilda: 9 As of the start of this year North had more untried first and second round draftees than any other club. If you go purely by age of list North...

Ok. If North take the spoo next year then your opinion means something. Right now you are a fanboi on an internet forum who thinks he knows better than a professional recruitment and list management team. Basket case. Wooden spoon. Your words.

Let me provide you with a little information which will assist you in not sounding like a high school drop out at a Trump rally. You are of the opinion that North are ‘a basket case’ because they are just starting a rebuild which will take a minimum of 3-5 years to get back to being a...

He has a linsfranc fracture. Wells had a linsfranc dislocation which took frikken ages to heal and is still managed. A club that picks him up would be tempted to give him half of next year to get back to full training.

Still managing the achilles week in, week out. Struggles to play when sore which shows how good he is considering he ain't been perfect this year.

I defiantly read this thread. Much against my better judgement

Mexico. Or New Mexico. Not sure.

Off the table. 4 year deal inked

Greg Denham says Anderson to North. Well, that's us out of the race.

Pick 14-15 actually seems about right for an uncontracted player.

Saints finishing top 6 next year?

What are you wearing?

And I can understand that is a factor too.

He's done that once in his professional career, this year against Werribee. At this stage he is potentially an very good player at AFL level, but thats it. He got talent, but so do a s**t load of other young blokes. They don't all come on.

Nice player with strong potential but there is a bit of over rating going here. The way he is being spoken about you would swear that he should have been destroying it at VFL level this year. 2 x BoG from 15 games, averaging 19.2 disposals, 1.67 goals, 3.1 marks and 4.8 tackles and across his...

Why cant he try do that at his current club? Hey, if he leaves good luck to him, but id rather he be a great player at North than anywhere else and if he does leave that we get value for investment. We wont get that this trade period so id rather he stay, play much better and if he still wants...

How dare the club bring in a player they think can perform well at AFL level, and use another who showed excellent promise and gave Goldy a chop out. So unprofessional of them.

Sure. Including lack of other key forward targets. Including playing in a poor team. Regardless he managed 24 goals in 16 games. As a primary target. Then when he was given AFL opportunities he stunk it up. I wanted him to succeed, but he didn't. You say he worked hard, fine. He got * all...

I stated that he either didnt work hard enough or he wasnt good enough. You say he worked his arse off. So he's not good enough then.

As in a new player to whom Blacks contract $$$ would go to. We are better off hanging on to Black in the hope that his value increases next year because his value now is as low as it has ever been. This draft is fairly shallow so a fourth rounder this year would be next to useless.

Reality is that is probably all he is worth right now, but nah. Unless we have a better option ready to come in and play forward.