Search results for query: *

Richmond traded in Westcoast and Freo third round picks. Richmond's draft hand next year 2024 is stacked. Currently looks like. Picks 6, 25, 26, 39, 43, 44, 62, 70 It's like there stockpiling for a fatherson or a trade for points. Picks after 26 equate to pick 11.

Believe it was mentioned that the future second the saints get is linked to Adelaide the same pick gws got in

With tight list spots clubs want to use more higher value picks than more lower value picks. For example if my club is only taking 3 picks in the draft. I would be more inclined to use picks 3, 40 and 50. Instead of picks 20, 25 and 30. Therefore I wouldn't trade pick 3 for 20, 25, 30 and...

Except as has been reported Geelong have very little salary cap Space and If J.Steven were to be traded to Geelong St.K would need to pay 200-300k of his Salary Next year.

Pick 12 and 21 thanks. Not gonna happen but 1 can dream.

Even if thats true thats still 33% more than Hill

Martin and Fyfe are worth 1.5+ million a season range. Hill is in a different market to those players all together. Keep in Mind St Kilda has plenty of cap space hence can over pay Hill, to entice him to join the club.

Ablett cost Pick 19 and a swap of 2nd round picks and was 4 years older than Steven at the time of Trade. Ablett also with similar go home issues. At miniumum Jack Steven is worth the same, and more likely a straight swap of Geelongs first round pick.

Really quite surprised that it hasn't been commented on. Do we even know who's draft picks were actually traded?

Who's future thrid? North made the Saints look like fools with this trade and there next 2

His a Restricted Free Agent. Gold Coast still has power, fortunately for them.

Pick 5 and Pick 15 is not the same as Pick 3 Lol. In my Mind his worth Pick 1 and Pick 10.

2014 Draft was said to be a super draft and Paddy McCartin hasn't shown much since his first 5 games. Draft Picks a well over rated. There is a chance that the player drafted wont reach there potential. It was a bit Rough RE: Buddy and the hawks should have been compensated slightly better...

Hawks weren't struggling and it worked out for them with a permership

Nick Bowen (AFL media) Just said GC is expected to accept pick 3 as compensation for Lynch. Got to be kidding himself. Lynch is a once in a lifetime player. GC should be asking for Next years first and second rounder and a top 5 pick this year at minimum. And theirs not reason Richmond...

Mitchell and Pick 36 to the Saints for Pick 10 and 46.

If Carlisle was a draft pick - Giant Deal: Gaints---------------------Pick 8 (1551) IN Picks 23 + 24 Out 8 Gain 49 Points (2 early round picks allow them to use pick 27 on another player) Saints ---------------------Pick 5 (1878) + Pick 24 (785) = 2663 Out Pick 5 + 24 In Carlisle + 8 Gain 156...

Well there you go, If people already knew whats the big deal about trading a second rounder back for pick 10.

http://www.saints.com.au/video/2015-10-12/bains-trade-wrap-day-1 From day 1 of Trade period

Have you seen the press conference.

A top 10 pick this year is worth much more than a second round pick than in previous drafts. The 2015 draft has very little depth, according to reports.

Pick 5 alone was off the table(still is), saints are open to a swap of picks.

It values Carlisle at pick 24 the pick he was drafted at.

STK will likely finish bottom 6 it wont be 2016 1st

Thats why we need pick 25

Thoughts on: Pick 10 and 63 for Carlisle and pick 25. Or the PSD