Search results for query: *

I don’t understand this. Why is the AFL introducing this when they already have AFL9s if they want a ‘kick and giggle’ comp? What’s the difference between the two (apart from the number of players, obviously)?

My understanding is that Port's contract with Adelaide Oval doesn't allow them to sell any home games, hence why they are relying on purchasing another team's home game.

Well as a Sydneysider currently down in Albury with my son for the NSW Schools U15 State Champs it looks pretty bloody heartland to me!

You don't happen to support Liverpool as well do you?

Wrong. The SCG Trust website confirms the goal line to goal line distance as 155.5m. The playing surface is 167m long.

LOL, you do realise that those wins were against other non-Victorian teams, right? So the ground was truly a neutral venue in those cases. FFS, at least do some basic research before you post!

And they'd be wrong as well.

Read your posts again and if you think what you've written in the context of this thread topic is in any way appropriate then good luck to you. Personally, I think you've been disgraceful - that's it, I'm not engaging with you from here on.

My, my, what a thoroughly unpleasant little troll you are.

Wait, what, we "payed everyone the same"? Am I reading you right, you're saying that McVeigh is being paid the same as Rampe, the same as Parker, the same as Aliir, the same as Laidler? Or are you saying that we somehow paid everyone the same COLA amount? Either way, please provide your source...

Ok, a difference in timing between discussions and the 'formal' notification then.

The club was advised by the AFL last week, not a month ago as you claim, according to the AFLs official statement.

He doesn't need to look it up in the dictionary, he knows it "back to front" apparently.

What? I honestly don't understand half of what you've written there. Enough, I'm signing off for a while, things to do, perhaps you might want to take the time to calm down a little.

Yes, I and many other supporters (of all clubs) and banging on about the decision because that's what the bloody thread is about and we have every right to bang on about it.

Yes, I'm well aware of your views on COLA. Your position is that, yet again, for the millionth time, there is value in arguing the pros and cons of COLA and the mechanics of how it functions. My view is that is bollocks and all you're doing is going over old ground because you see it as a much...

And why are you asking these questions? The issue of Sydney not getting the COLA was done and dusted months ago. This thread is going off the rails because the likes of Alsmypal have deliberately pushed it off the rails. Go back to the beginning of this thread when there was some sanity being...

I don't know why and neither do you. So stop trying to pass off your conjecture as fact.

So you've made up something, or have just been lazy and repeated something that someone else made up and think we should take you seriously. FFS.

Very true ^

Okay, so let's say that Patfull was going to the Swans. Your previous posts suggest that that would have been accomplished by the Swans "taking the piss" out of the rules. Actually you state as a matter of fact that that's why we've had the trade ban imposed. So, here's a very simple task for...

Ah, okay got it, thanks for taking the time to explain it, Charlie.

We broke the salary cap?!!!! Christ, please show me where the AFL have said that we did that.

And the news today said that it's about to get even more expensive!

So your original post was bullshit then. Thanks.

You're actually challenging the description of how the COLA should work now, not how we may have rorted it? Holy hell, you have lost the plot.

You really believe that all three players are top 10? Really?

Sorry mate, I'm honestly not stating this in some kind of smart-arse way but I'm not sure I understand you point. Could you rephrase please?

You can't be serious! You can't honestly be offering up that article and your weasly words as "evidence". Your post said we rorted the system. Nothing you provided even comes close to substantiating that.

I've been banging on a lot tonight about the production of evidence to demonstrate that the Swans have been doing something dodgy re the COLA. That's mainly because I'm tired of all the s**t being put on the club I love with nothing to substantiate it. That is different to opposition fans not...