Search results for query: *

Forest 3-0 at the half. Should have been 5 but I'll take it.

In the end I'll take the point for Forest. A lot of teams helped us out today. We are goal difference out of the relegation zone. Awful first half, crappy team selection. Finally Reyna got some solid minutes and we looked heaps better.

Opinions are interesting. Casemiro had to come closer to Felipe's line to meet the drop. At the end of the day we will never know, because Man U had a player deliberately offside blocking his run. Don't get me wrong, Forest got what they deserved. We waste so many chances. We just don't...

Danilo and Felipe are short and Danilo nearly got his head to it. Felipe wasn't flat-footed in your photo. He was the first one breaking towards the goals. Look at the positioning. Casemiro was in line with the near post. Felipe was closer to where the ball was headed. Liverpool had a goal...

In terms of where the ball was coming from yes. He was in line with him though and could have affected it. The Man U player was offside and affected one of our defenders. I didn't like it.

Not sure how they could tell that Yates wouldn't have got to that. I hate VAR. We never get the rub of the green.

That's the farce though. Over a year since Man City have been charged for historical breaches and no hearing in sight. Everton lost points for last year's breaches, which would have sent them down last year. Forest gets charged and they are eager to finalise it since we are in a relegation...

To get everything finalised, don't they need to let Man City know too? That's not going to happen. I'm happy to wait and apply it to next year though ;)

I'm hoping Everton having some points restored, will have a flow on effect for Forest, when our case is heard. The FFP does nothing except allow the rich clubs to spend more than the poor clubs. For Forest the whole thing is so much worse, because we were only allowed to lose $61m over 3 years...

As a Forest fan, l think he's great.

Hudson-Odoi! Phew, took a long time to secure this one. Should have been an easy win.

Forest totally deserve that half time lead. Hell of a ball from Domingue to Awoniyi, who is just so strong on the turn. With so many attacking opportunities, this felt like one where West Ham would score against the run of play. Glad we scored.

More injuries but Forest beat Bristol City on penalties. Next up: Nottingham Forest vs Manchester United @ City Ground

I'm wanting to watch the 4th round replay between Forest and Bristol City and it's not coming up on Paramount+. What am I missing? Forest can barely form a team at this stage with injury, suspension, and unavailability. We will need to scrap this one out.

Man U went about 35 minutes without a shot, and even then I don't know if it was credited as it went straight into the closest defender. Forest were more enterprising but couldn't turn their attacks into shots either. They had the only real chances of the half.

Well Marinakis made the right choice is bringing in Nuno for Cooper. How good do Forest look in attack now? If we can address our goalkeeper problem, then we won't go near the relegation zone for some time. A real buzz around the club. A big month or so coming up with the African Cup of...

I think Turner put that one to bed.

He has a lot to learn still. Should have passed off with his first run for a Wood chip in, but went for goal. Wood ripped into him and he gave it off the very next opportunity. Then he should have put one away to the keeper's left, under no pressure and he got bugger all on it and kicked it...

I'm happy. Bargain for 15m.

That Forest win showed a heap of promise for Nuno's plans moving forward. The changes were fantastic and we really could/should have won by more. Probably our best all round performance since we came back to the premier league. Show more of that and the manager change will be justified. MGW...

I'm not Adelaide. Make the business case to the Adelaide Football Club and see if you win that argument.

I appreciate you conceding you were trying to be a dick. As I said, not everything is subjective. Some things are clear and factual. The Boly example is one of those and the league concedes this. Why you are pretending that the ref's decision is just as valid as the league's contention that...

I'll stop analysing you when you stop posting like a dick when you reply to everyone. I'm not sure why you are going on about subjective decisions. If a review shows a decision is wrong, that's not subjective, that's evidence based. I wouldn't complain about anything that was reviewed and...

I didn't prove anything. You said people would be reviewing penalties and goal kicks if they allowed this. Nobody is advocating that. We're just advocating the ability to review calls that see players off the ground and suspended for matches, as those completely ruin games. Of course there...

How often does that happen? Do you want them to get it right or do you just want your viewing experience to be expedient? It's a billion dollar industry with so much riding on these calls. Maybe a little bit of due diligence isn't so bad.

This slippery slope argument makes no sense to me. One thing doesn't necessarily have to lead to another and two wrongs don't make a right. Why do we have goal reviews in AFL? Why do we have tribunal hearings? I mean, there are other issues within the game that need some work as well, so if...

After the game, in order to review the automatic suspension? Yeah, why not indeed. If it is bogus, remove it. Why would a professional competition continue to suspend players who didn't deserve to be suspended? I get that they aren't going to review every yellow card via VAR in game as it is...

It has been more than one post. Nothing wrong with being constructive in your arguments. What's wrong with reviewing a yellow after the fact to overturn a suspension? It doesn't affect anything in game. They have all the time in the world post match. They can already review reds after the...

Your aggression doesn't make for an argument either. Just tells a lot about you. If you were following the discussion, it was about changing the rules so that the automatic suspension for a bogus yellow could be reviewed. Now back in your unnecessarily angry little box.

It wasn't soft, it was not there at all. Then he gets to serve a suspension for it despite the league conceding it was a bad call. Your answer is to leave it and stop sooking? Genius.