Search results for query: *

"tabloids" usually give a much shorter window. 24 hours + more time if required was generous. also note that none of the statements reference the ABC reporting, just that they had no opportunity to contribute to the Hawthorn internal review. they knew.

I agree that would be weird if you walked into court and Judge fishardansin was presiding but what could you do

Almost certainly it was because what they thought they were doing was in the best interests of the player through some sick logic. Likely in some cases the woman involved was seen as a destructive influence and they were doing it out of what they saw to be care, and nobody went against it...

Old mate is being a dog with a bone after misinterpreting a post a couple of pages back because he believes racism is pervasive rather than systemic and for some reason feels like fighting that fight at 9:45pm on Bigfooty. I would leave it

Perhaps because a prominent Indigenous sportsperson has spoken specifically about his experiences of systemic racism and people are choosing to listen to him? Dunno. Maybe we should listen to the random bloke on the internet

That’s not what systemic racism is, but also nobody is putting the pool anecdote forward as a specific example divorced from his broader comment which WAS specifically about systemic racism.

Literally just posted a clip where he spoke about how indigenous people face systemic racism across a whole range of areas including health, justice and education. If you can watch those clips, actually listen to what he is saying, and your response is still "yeah but that isn't an example of...

I don’t need to answer your question champ. Listen to what the man is saying and take it in.

“…the education system, the justice system, the health system…”

one for the “systemic racism does not exist” clowns

nobody is being deformed here

This theory about how the media and politicians are trying to "divide us" is exclusively perpetuated by cooked men on the internet who don't have the ability to listen to others. They also love to use the terms "woke", "plandemic" and "Dictator Dan"

It's pretty clear you don't understand the meaning of the term sir.

so which countries are the racist ones

I know that institutions have done a great job of undermining the public's faith in journalism, but still can't get my head around why people would be putting their faith in any investigation which has zero obligation to release findings to the public. The journalism looks sound here and we...

not that it's a crime not to be across the details but considering you seemed to miss both the reason for withholding names and the fact that the ABC had done investigation independently of the commissioned Hawthorn report, both which were clear from the article, I thought it was worth...

"Three families at the centre of the investigation have told ABC Sport about the grief and trauma caused by their experiences. On account of their complex mental health challenges, and the need to protect their children, their names have been changed." "ABC Sport put detailed questions about...

"According to the families of three players interviewed by ABC Sport, the incidents at the centre of the review allegedly took place during Clarkson's time as head coach, a period in which the club won four AFL premierships, including a historic treble between 2013 and 2015."

thanks for this. 👏

Robbo: (muffled)...y’know I probably shouldn’t say this but ASADA. NEEDS. TO. COME. OUT. AND. SAY.... etc etc *pounds table*

you've had to tip Richmond losing by 10 goals for four weeks in a row to get that.

and yet, on top of the ladder

lol, mate. at least keep the banter relevant. just pointing out that your were shocking coming off the bye (as were we), making the "rest" decision even more baffling.

they're pretty good coming off a rest: http://www.nmfc.com.au/game/2015/14/gcfc-v-nmfc

pretty clear to me that he's willing to let this happen so he can push through his fixture "reforms" that were shouted down at the last clubs meeting. straight out of the Tony Abbott playbook.

one question; theoretically if the Hawks chose to match, would they be able to offer the same figure minus COLA to be seen as "matching" the deal?

All done. Description Date Opponent Result K HB D M G B T HO GA I50 FF FA DT SC Round 19 3rd Aug Hawthorn Win 107-66 14 14 28 5 0 0 1 0 0 5 1 1 87 84 Round 18 28th Jul Sydney Loss 63-110 18 4 22 6 0 0 2 0 0 4 3 0 91 93 Round 17 21st Jul Fremantle Win 84-57 11 9 20 6 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 73 73

at the very start of the webcast a bloke came out and said something along the lines of "Gill is going to be out in a minute... We'll take two or three Essendon questions". they expected it. why this boring-as-frak presser was webcast i will never know. ten minutes of my life i will never get back.

Heppell needs a haircut badly. Cotchin has impeccable hair. Lock the thread.