Search results for query: *

I can only imagine.

No you couldn't. You'd be struggling to pay the cap now as it is. And the last time you were even in a position to pay over the cap it was because you were 20% Carlton owned.

Clubs do it. I think the AFL probably had a word.

I dunno about that Puskás in white Puskás in dark

And the extra white on the Collingwood Black jumper helps with this. Well done Collingwood, looks good.

Pyjamas

I don't think he did mix them up. The AFL would like you to think he did though, so they can be left to their own devices when it comes to who gets to play (with drugs) and who doesn't. Joel Smith would have to be very silly to test positive on match day when there's a system designed to...

There's a reasonable expectation that of the AFL wish to continue making a profit from gambling revenue that disclosure is made regarding a competitor's fitness. That's the public interest. A player comes back from a 12 week hamstring in worse form than a player who has had a twelve week...

They allow this information all the time and for everything else. Mental health, ruptured testes, cancer, sprained ankle. Hiding behind "but it's confidential medical information" when it only seems to be a problem with drugs is a bit of a joke.

Is this where the other SANFL clubs all band together and send a Crows reserve side to the VFL?

But coaches are given medical information with everything else? No one will buy 4 week awareness. Tell them it's a ruptured testicle.

This is true. And when they're promoting the crap out of sports betting and then misinforming punters about the health of participants, it's quite probably illegal.

They haven't categorically denied the accusations. They have said it didn't happen in the manner described

I would've thought the AFL CEO was guest of the President of the home team, rather than the other way around.

And there's also a competition integrity issue, with players treated based upon their marketability within the game. Whole thing stinks to high heaven.

Credit to Fagan for not taking part in the action.

Maybe the coach themselves is an addict. Maybe they even got on together.

This is, of course, after his lawyers failed in their bid to have it all thrown out.

I know an even more cost effective way to avoid a doping violation

I seen an article about how they "welcomed" the chance to finally tell their side of the story/meet with the aggrieved parties. Funny, given that they unsuccessfully tried to get their lawyers to block it from going ahead.

You should be able to tell the difference between sides at 1080p

It's shameful regardless of what happens.

That's what happens when people are more interested in buying the latest merchandise and eliminating non existent "clashes" than clubs retaining a clear identity.

So then North weren't copied by every other club since. Why lie about stuff?

Globall predates The Huddle.

I think they've shown great strength not bowing to your pressure.

Cricket did collapse.

Friday night footy only really got big once North were punted and people could watch clubs they care about play.

Difference probably being that Hawthorn put their pokies money back into the footy dept as "community benefit", instead of local sporting clubs. Who looks after our spiritual home if the bowls club goes belly up?

Juve actually started out in the pink tops, so it'd be fine if they wore those against Collingwood who had the black and white stripes first.