Search results for query: *

Well I'm glad the AFL went with the option that demonstrates that these 'slips of the tongue' (I mean. really?) have no place in the game whatsoever.

Confidentiality agreements???? How much of a flashing red light did they need? Bloody hell. I though that sort of thing was for post-season piss ups, not pre-season camps.

So the power stance thing was the tip of the iceberg, as that was the visible stupid but below the surface there was a whole a lot more stupid going on. I mean surely someone in the club should have realised that having the players look like idiots before the game was hardly a good idea, and...

Are there damages involved or just court costs, apologies and retractions? I mean you'd expect damages if they've dragged a corporation's name through the mud in such a high profile fashion, wouldn't you?

Imagine how much worse off Adelaide would have been if it wasn't for the camp that Tex and Rory reckons was grouse!

:rolleyes:

To be fair, the NRL was going through this pretty much every preseason there for a while, they had to do something.

It seems to me that warning bells must ring whenever the club doctor gets left out anything these days.

It didn't look to me like he was mocking anyone's disability so I don't see the problem. Feel free to educate me if I'm wrong though.

I'm not entirely certain why any team would want him. He's good at press conferences after being sacked, but what else? I'm sure GWS and Port will pretend to be interested though.

Please post the respective press releases from the aforementioned clubs. Thank you in advance.

Chasing Hird was never about getting the best coach at Essendon, because he wasn't even a coach when they chased him, let alone in the top echelon. However, from a marketing viewpoint it is an extremely sensible thing to do, as proven by the increased memberships and the buzz around the club...

If the alternative was the Ablett Circus, then yes, I think I would.

Very impressive by Harvey if that's the case. Good, realistic attitude and pretty much the best outcome for all involved (if a player is going i mean, not actually losing the player in the first place).

The attitude of some people on here is why a lot of this sort of thing remains an undiagnosed and untreated problem. It's either real or it's not.

I am interested to see how many people have such strong opinions about something they know nothing about. Adds to the bloody problem.

I wasn't aware it was that simple.