Search results for query: *

How the AFL amended the memo to all clubs this morning:

Oh no, I've been "champed". I'm almost too scared to respond to this obvious internet tough guy. Now, if you followed the discussion, we were talking about the newest allegations - the ones that have resulted in TT getting the sack. Yes, previously there were numerous accusations/ allegations...

Try learning to read properly. I said "actual physical domestic violence". You are all bleeding heart about verbal texts but won't respond about the case of physical violence. It's almost as if you're avoiding it. And no, you show your ignorance again, he wasn't accused of physical violence...

Maybe it's just me, but I think that's pretty pathetic if you're on Bigfooty. Anyway, it's nowhere near as pathetic as hiding behind it so you can again ignore giving your views on actual physical domestic violence when you've displayed so much emotional angst denouncing verbal domestic violence.

So you ignore the fact that your club took no action against a known wife-basher, because you don't think it's as bad as the verbal abuse that you are so passionately appalled by? That's more than tone deaf, it's outright hypocrisy from you. You have zero credibility with these fake outrage posts.

Yes. FFS. I suspect you're ignorant of this as well - google Nathan Bock and make an assessment of what your pissant club did with him on the list.

Maybe one or two delusional ones, but the vast majority of North supporters knew he had done it. It was proven last year. The grating thing for us is that he did it again.

Yeah, good cherry-picking. You still seem to have missed the fact that he was banned from the team from the latter part of season 2022, lasting the best part of a year. The banning was a consequence of his (admitted at the time) actions and they were strict on him going through the education...

Is anyone saying he wasn't?

You really do keep missing the point. Badly. If you don't want to keep looking stupid, find out more about what the club did from mid-2022 when he started getting into trouble.

No, it wasn't. What a ridiculous interpretation.

LOL. Surely you can't be this stupid.

Oh Lance, I got the reference to your post and acknowledged it as a good line. Just clarified the facts. You seem salty since I called your ignorance on straw man arguments.

A good line, but Vitas was American (of Lithuanian heritage). Died very young in tragic circumstances, too. (Guillermo Vilas was the famous Argentine player of the era).

Suggest you brush up on your understanding of straw man, Lance. My post was a question that was directly on point.

Fair enough, it means you're consistent. Like you, I'll still support my club even if they make decisions that I am strongly opposed to. In the Thomas case, I would oppose North retaining him if the current accusations relate to things he's done since completing the education program.

So, you must've nearly cut up your membership card when Jake Stringer was recruited, no?

This is all fair per se. We know his past behaviour was unacceptable and that is why he was suspended for a long time internally, and required to complete education courses, along with taking a part-time cleaning job. The club waited until he met the set standards before he returned to the team...

So, you don't need to know what he's done, but you've already judged him? LOL.

Bullshit. The point doesn't stand because they (North) had to wait until today to receive the AFL's draft report detailing the investigation and findings. They are going through that as we speak and will make a club announcement a bit before or a bit after the official AFL announcement tomorrow...

How? Are you saying the official decision by the AFL has been announced? Hint - AFL are saying they haven't announced it yet.

The talk on the North board is that North and Thomas' legal representative are pushing back against the harshness of the AFL's proposed sanction. An 18-week suspension has been suggested by more than one source (although, to be honest, the thread is a sh*tshow and many other alternatives have...

At Sandy or Moorabbin?

In a sense, they did. Clearly the most talented list in the comp and they've lost their last 4 finals. I think the coach is toxic (just my opinion).

Is there any space next to the fence for our wheelchairs?

It really hasn't. It's throughout this thread and easily located on google.

Your inability to acknowledge facts suggests that you really don't know.

So, you're still refusing to acknowledge the disabled kid bullying? Poor behaviour by anyone's definition. And if you really believe what you're saying about the extra work at Sandy, you're clueless.

You can't have been much help to him if you keep pretending he hasn't done anything wrong. Sounds like he got away with poor behaviour because no-one pulled him up on it.

But none of the other recruits are doing that. At St Kilda or any other club.