Search results for query: *

any chance of a link?

Ok, now I have more questions haha If WB trade the compo pick to GC this year, they don't have to use it this year, right? And, if GC get this pick and hold it over to next year, does the pick then become relevant to GC ladder position, or WB?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but couldn't the Dogs compo pick become a top ten pick next year, if in possession of Gold Coast?

Re: Done - Will Sierakowski to North for Pick 58 - Twitter Brian Sierakowski - 1966 StK Premiership player David Sierakowski - StK and WCE player - Son of Brian Will Sierakowski - Haw/NM player - Nephew of Brian, Cousin of David :)

Not really an answer to the question at hand, and I don't really have anything to get over, but anyway... On topic, seems both players could benefit from a fresh start

Would you trade Sharrod Wellingham and a second round pick for Luke Ball?

You can name your price in the PSD, not the ND. Im pretty sure you must nominate for the ND at some stage before you can nominate for the PSD also...or maybe not (Anyone know Jurrah's situation last year?)

Skipworth got drafted...

Didnt 60-70 players get drafted before him? Im guessing every team got, I dont know, at least 3 picks in that first draft...

I saw that. You and the post after you seemed closest from what I saw

1. Melbourne - Jack Watts 2. West Coast Eagles - Nicholas Naitanui 3. Fremantle - Stephen Hill 4. Port Adelaide - Tyrone Vickery 5. Essendon - Daniel Rich 6. Carlton - Michael Hurley 7. Brisbane Lions - Jack Ziebell 8. Richmond - Hamish Hartlett 9. North Melbourne - Chris Yarran 10...

That was an incredible draft!

Good thread, although you may need to keep the sarcasm to a minimum... remember where you are ;)

If we get a First-rounder for Didak, then we can trade 2 first-round picks for one of the players in the OP! Especially Johncock!

Id say its all over He's had a crack at 2 clubs now, and hasnt made an impact

Dangerfield? Wasnt he drafted?

Just curious as to why Collingwood and Geelong are not forced to use picks 90 and 96 as I believed that to be a rule that you use all picks you receive in trades

They will change the election, thats what!

Aker deal was Monday

Well we wont get any pick lower than 14 now, and Im hoping we have 17, but thats another story! Rumour is Didak to go home, I hope not, but hypothetically, Didak to Adelaide for Pick 10... Judd to Collingwood... Davis/O'Brien + pick 10 + pick 14-17

On Gaertner, should we be thinking early Michael Johnson days, in regards to the above quote and the s**t kicking? Edit- After reading on, saw the comments about Goodes and Brennan, so Im happy with that, cheers

Who are we trading to get up to pick 6-8 :D

Why restrict it at all If a player has been deemed not good enough to go on any teams list, although he has played before, and he falls to your pick, why shouldnt you be allowed to get him? I thought the whole situation with the West Coast guy was a farce, which could have been avoided...

Oh well, he'll strengthen their VFL side... oh wait!... Good on him, top footballer in the VFL for many years, hope he gets a good crack at it

He is applicable to one of the above...

Send him to Frankston for a year Theyll work something out no doubt

Ouch!

Collingwood: Jason Cloke, Shane O'Bree, Tristen Walker, Julian Rowe, Guy Richards

There are plans to have one rookie spot available for a player of any age, giving guys like Woewodin and the like another go for minimum wage. If you were on the verge of a flag, why wouldnt you want a ready made hard bodied player sitting there for peanuts to replace a long term injury if need be

Yes I do Are you Lonies brother, Goesbang? The AFL 2006 book has it all, every draft since 1986