Search results for query: *

I didn’t say Richmond had to win the poll, but clearly you’d agree people like to troll Richmond supporters?

Strange anomaly that such a dominant and skilled team kept losing to a weaker Richmond team in their strongest years. Kind of defies logic to suggest the same team would dominate a much stronger Richmond team. 2012 Rich 137 Haw 75 2013 Rich 107 Haw 66 2014 Rich 52 Haw 118 2015 Rich 71 Haw 53

Accurate Richmond polls are all but dead on BF, the fake news trolls are ruining history. Makes this kind of discussion almost pointless, may as well get some Russian bots involved.

McCluggage up there with Fyfe as a great ball winner but s**t set shot goal kicker.

Walsh is a gun, best midfielder at Carlton already, amazing work rate and skill set.

Nick the better athlete, Jack the better footballer.

Coach is helping to end his career playing him back pocket, permanent inside mid or needs to retire.

Lynch kicked 4 on him in the first half before he left the game. I think that performance shows Roughead is not even in the conversation.

Cripps is a gun, would be a starting midfielder in any team, Oliver not quite there yet.

Edwards was close to winning a Norm Smith in the only game that matters. The true test of a player and he passed with flying colours.

Rance is and will always be a better Backman than Hurley, there’s just no way anyone in football with an unbiased view will see it otherwise so it’s a pointless argument. However Hurley is a much better forward than Rance. He should be played there permanently, it would take the pressure off...

The game was won in that first quarter.

I might put together a stellar reel for him.

http://www.richmondfc.com.au/video/2013-08-12/round-20-conca-kicks-three not highlights as such, but a good game he played 2 weeks ago.

So that's his highlight reel?

Conca 28 and 3 goal BOG game today.

To put it simply both lists are coming into their prime and will have 33.333% of their players move into the "present" in the next 2 years... Should be a cracking rivalry.

My formula is based on age really. Past = 29-120 Present = 25-28 Future =18-25 When a club gets 33.333% in all brackets it's a list primed for success.

It would vary from player to player. Scope is measured on potential, hey I never said it was an exact science.

Past = % of the list that are past their peak Present = % of the list that are at their peak Future = % of the list that have yet to reach their peak. I'm the new David King.

A list is a reflection of the past, present and future. Past North 25% Rich 15% Present North 35% Rich 25% Future North 40% Rich 60% These are just rough %'s and how I personally see the lists from an age and talent point of view, it ain't science but it is my view.

Yeah, doesn't get much bigger than playing an underwhelming StKilda in NZ.

Today Dimma mentioned that Dusty got his bench rotations right, he'd been staying on to long and running out of steam, he was still running on top of the ground at the final siren. Big year ahead.

He'd actually fit nicely into your forward line, maybe replacing Petrie next year.

Pretty much.

North showed today that their "depth" isn't as deep or competitive as they'd hoped, players playing for a round one spot and they get smashed by 100.

It's subjective. Potential is regarded high in my analysis of our list, but potential is often over looked by opposition supporters, but not for their own as they know the intricacies of individuals in more detail.

So you're saying you like a lot of Cox?

Yeah, you've hit the nail on the head.

Fletcher and Dyson will be gone in a year or 2. You'll need some elite kicks back there, why do you think Hird was so desperate to keep him?