Him and Ridley are the last two to be traded. Untouchables.We should trade him, not because we need to, but because he seems like a really good bloke and I feel real bad for him to be at this dissapointment of a club.
It was a joke brotherHim and Ridley are the last two to be traded. Untouchables.
2 year deal just signed according to a members email
Yep my exact concern as well. Hopefully he'll be captain by then.Only 2 years?
Probably gives him a better chance of a pay-day; 2 years time he's potentially played full-time mid for two seasons, and highly likely he's club captain. Much better negotiating position.My thoughts exactly.
Why not 4 years?
1) He will be worth more by thenOnly 2 years?
Makes sense. Forgive me if it still sends an ill wind through my very soul.Probably gives him a better chance of a pay-day; 2 years time he's potentially played full-time mid for two seasons, and highly likely he's club captain. Much better negotiating position.
Wouldn't worry too much, from an athlete management point of view it makes a lot of sense given where the game is at right now. A lot of unknowns, big thing is he's signed on now, amidst all the speculation and rumours.Makes sense. Forgive me if it still sends an ill wind through my very soul.
Scottie PippenSigning long contracts as a young (very talented) player can hurt rather than help you. The security's good yes, but when you improve, you could be already locked into a deal that's far below what your performance warrants.
Wouldn't worry too much, from an athlete management point of view it makes a lot of sense given where the game is at right now. A lot of unknowns, big thing is he's signed on now, amidst all the speculation and rumours.
Ok well you've both eased my concerns. I view this now as 'GREAT NEWS!'Signing long contracts as a young (very talented) player can hurt rather than help you. The security's good yes, but when you improve, you could be already locked into a deal that's far below what your performance warrants.
It may be a Captain Obvious statement - but we didn't take the same approach with SaadWouldn't worry too much, from an athlete management point of view it makes a lot of sense given where the game is at right now. A lot of unknowns, big thing is he's signed on now, amidst all the speculation and rumours.
Not sure what you're meaning here sorry?It may be a Captain Obvious statement - but we didn't take the same approach with Saad
You were syaing that 2 years is a good option based on current circumstances of the game, which I don't entirely disagree with.Not sure what you're meaning here sorry?
in 2 years McGrath will be worth far more than the offer we tabled to Saad.You were syaing that 2 years is a good option based on current circumstances of the game, which I don't entirely disagree with.
My point was more that we offered Saad 5 years under the same conditions, so I don't know if the state of the AFL is really changing contract offers and their length for any club.
Different stages of their career; McGrath is still trending upwards, and is (in my guess) likely to be the Captain in 2 years time, his earning potential now is much lower than in two years time.You were syaing that 2 years is a good option based on current circumstances of the game, which I don't entirely disagree with.
My point was more that we offered Saad 5 years under the same conditions, so I don't know if the state of the AFL is really changing contract offers and their length for any club.
Probably because he is backing his value to skyrocket in the next 2 seasons.Only 2 years?