There is no doubt that we need 2 AFL capable rucks on the list next year. What i want to see is a more flexible approach where those rucks do not possess the same constraints around the ground, and the same selection pressure.
The 2nd ruckman plays in the seniors if there is a need, but alternatively we use a Pederson type (would rather not trade) if more mobility is required.
There is no doubt North felt pressure to play Hamish and Goldy early in the season, which forced desperate ideas like playing Goldy at CHB.
If North are sure they can bring in a up-and-coming AFL ruckman who will develop and perform in-and-out of the seniors, then I have no problem with trading Hamish so he can get more opportunities. He deserves it.
At his age he won't likely be there for our true premiership window. While i do understand the concept of needing quality players in order to open this window, if we can bolster our midfield as a result of this trade with an eye to our premiership window, then I believe this more than compensates. Even without Hamish there is no doubt we will have a window of opportunity.
Without understanding the entire trading strategy of the club this year no-one can make an informed judgement on whether trading Hamish is optimal for our success next year. I will just sit back and have faith that the football department/recruiting staff that are on track to form a strong playing list, capable of premierships in 3-4 years, know what they are doing.