Current 10 years jail for possessing Child Sex Dolls

Remove this Banner Ad

There's a lot of disturbing things out there (yes, child dolls would top that list for sure)- including pr0n depicting rape.

You could almost argue that had a direct influence on Jaymes Todd raping and murdering Eurydice Dixon. Do we need to ban that as well?


/for the record my answer to that q is no.
 
Mate you sound like you would give a green light to these things simply because you have no solid proof that it can lead to child molestation. Even if a convicted kiddy fiddler was caught with one of these we would not hear about it anyway due to the fcuked up “protection laws” for these animals. I say it again, adults practicing having sex on toys made to look like 10 year old children is not normal or socially acceptable. It is a ticking fcuking time bomb and some poor child will be the eventual victim. The amount of resources then spent on this child’s recovery & counseling for the rest of his/her life plus the same taxpayer resources used to house, protect and ‘rehabilitate’ the offending rock spider far outweighs the democratic view that this could be “ok”.

Adults practicing having sex on dolls as you put it, could, as already mentioned, be enough that they don't have sex with our kids.

For someone with urges, one of these or a whole gaggle of these might be enough.

If they can't get one they might just get themselves a real one from somewhere.
 
Adults practicing having sex on dolls as you put it, could, as already mentioned, be enough that they don't have sex with our kids.

For someone with urges, one of these or a whole gaggle of these might be enough.

If they can't get one they might just get themselves a real one from somewhere.
Kind of like how Ted Bundy started off insisting his girlfriends pretended they were dead whilst having sex with him?

Well that satisfied his urges splendidly...
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Some people must think that taking these dolls away will just magically make the paedophile not have urges to offend any children. The urges are not always something that can be helped. Better them ******* these inanimate objects than even looking at child pr0n.

The whole scenario is ****ed but at least no one gets hurt here. If any one actually thinks that taking these dolls away will actually change anything they're kidding themselves.
 
Some people must think that taking these dolls away will just magically make the paedophile not have urges to offend any children. The urges are not always something that can be helped. Better them ******* these inanimate objects than even looking at child pr0n.

The whole scenario is f’ed but at least no one gets hurt here. If any one actually thinks that taking these dolls away will actually change anything they're kidding themselves.
Legally enabling these diseased people is not valid answer either.

It is like giving a heroin addict a toy syringe. Do you think that would stop their cravings?
 
Who the * would even think to make this s**t?



stupid campaigners. Give them life. And the *******s who make them.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #37
The police have their first arrest. I get it, it's only a doll but ewwwww anyway.

A South Australian man has become the first person to be charged for possessing a child-like sex doll under new laws which came into force in 2019.
It is alleged the 30-year-old from the state's southeast also bought a range of children's clothes including schools uniforms, swimwear and underwear.

 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top