Scary to think he could potentially be a 100 game player by the end of this season.
And that's what makes it so frustrating.
Melksham #10, Colyer #26 in 2009 draft, born five days apart (turning 23 in two months). 92 games v 37 games.
Colyer has had limited opportunities, particularly in comparison to Melksham. Melksham has also played now for a while in a decent team and has not had to really shoulder a midfield load or anything to hamper his development. Colyer, I'm willing to give some more time.
Jake, please, give us something!
PS. He could play his 100th against Carlton in Rd 23 if he doesn't miss.