Player Watch #18: Michael Hurley

(Log in to remove this ad.)

rines

Norm Smith Medallist
Suspended
Joined
Sep 28, 2007
Posts
8,340
Likes
9,310
AFL Club
Essendon
I see your point pevers.. timing on lead is not just instinct but also grows as 'links' are formed.. like mcveigh/hird being able to hit up lloyd without looking etc..

so three problems.. our mids haven't been reliable enough for any of our forwards to lead consistently, our forwards do often lead at the wrong time and to the wrong spots and three: our disposal going into the F50 is disgusting. All three areas need to improve if we are to move up the ladder.
 

Phone

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Apr 7, 2010
Posts
26,571
Likes
8,381
Location
La Capanna Restaurant.
AFL Club
Essendon

GUMBLETRON

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Posts
12,403
Likes
12,534
Location
NASA
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Coburg
http://www.essendonfc.com.au/news/2013-03-08/hurley-i-want-to-play-forward

I may be a bit slow on the uptake but it seems that arguments for Hurley playing in defence are really more about a dislike of Hooker than any belief that Hurley, in isolation, is more suited to being/better as a defender than a forward.
I don't think there's anything particularly contentious about that - it's a question more of where Hurley is most beneficial to the team than where individually he is best.
 

Charliebrow 16

Premiership Player
Joined
Oct 3, 2006
Posts
3,644
Likes
2,478
Location
Tasmania
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Celtics, Federer, Birmingham FC
I loved that bit of play where he took the difficult overhead grab, crept back off the mark, paused for a brief second to assess his options, and then proceeded to kick a 45m pass with his left straight onto Ryder's chest. One of the plays of the night.

He's been gradually building up and improving this pre-season, continually getting better with every game he plays. Hopefully this trend continues and he can set himself for a big performance in the opening round against Adelaide. Obviously I'd like more goals, but he'll get there.
 

The Fact

Club Legend
Joined
May 23, 2009
Posts
1,564
Likes
300
Location
Wheelers Hill
AFL Club
Essendon
I'm sorry, but did I see Hurley lead flat out at and take a one grab contested mark away from his body? Twice?

applepie.gif

But apparently he's no good as a forward because he can't time his leads, runs under the ball, and can't mark anymore
It's funny I saw it too but remember in his juniors even though at club level tac level he played as a forward, he also played as a backman thus meaning he only knows how to punch a ball...... :rolleyes:
 

cAsEy_18

Premiership Player
Joined
Apr 13, 2007
Posts
4,927
Likes
1,136
Location
Frankston
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Yankees, Chelseas, YCW.
And that is why you don't measure Hurley on his goal tally. Thought he was superb last night...zero goals. His presenting and marking was as good as ever. Loved his left foot pass to Ryder too, so natural.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Joined
Jan 7, 2005
Posts
59,857
Likes
61,063
Location
Down the rabbit hole
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Fatebringer
Someone posted in the VFL thread that he was sighted at the VFL game with a moon boot on. What happened?

I didn't watch the game last night so I'm a little in the dark.
Rolled an ankle. Apparently it's just precautionary, keeping the weight off it
 

fishardansin

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Apr 6, 2008
Posts
15,185
Likes
10,106
Location
coburg
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Australian cricket team
Ok I'm going to put this out there. This year is Hurley's last chance ....... to prove he can be as effective up forward as down back.

Hooker or Pears would make solid trades at the end of the year as we look to continue bolstering our small forward and attacking mid department.

This is 100% gut from me, I've got enough to know about that, but I'm just feeling it from him up forward at the moment. He's just not dominant up there and struggle to make the play. He seems at sixes or sevens where to position himself and for someone as good as he is one on one he seems to second guess whether to attack the ball or try to slip out the back.

Hopefully it is just mental and he can sort it out soon but playing back he just seems very natural/relaxed and positions himself well and from there attacks the ball with confidence.

It is counter intuitive but he's far more attacking when playing in defense and having him there, especially post Fletch, will see us able to be a more attacking side as well as surer down back. Hurley, Carlisle, Pears, Hibberd and Dempsey makes for a lot of very good ball movement out of the back half, especially if Heppell and Goddard are rotating through there. It also means that we can carry Hardingham's shaky disposal.

Another year under Daniher's belt, Crameri and resting ruck might be enough marking up forward.

I would still persist with Hurley up forward this year but I'm starting to think it might be a waste of his talents.
 

ghostdog

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Oct 18, 2008
Posts
5,071
Likes
1,778
Location
gondawanaland
AFL Club
Essendon
Is it alwasy the kickers fault or does some of the blame lie with the forwards not iming their leads, not running to the right spots or just having zero ability to judge a ball in flight and not run under it. I think there is a skill to being a fwd more than just marking and kicking goals. it is about knowing how to judge where to be and when to be there so you can at least contest.

I look at our team and see only 2 talls that I think have this trait - Gumby and JD. Why? Because they are the only two real fwds we have. Fwd smarts cannot be taught. This is why Hurley will contine to frustrate.

It is no different to backmen knowing how to zone and be thrid man up and how to postiion your body against your opponent when 1 on 1. Hurley has natural skills for one of the two areas on the ground.

There is a reason Davey is our CHF more often than not. Becuase he actually is a fwd who knows where to lead. If only he were 20cm taller.
I'd be interested to know, from the two games in succession where he kicked 11 goals, how many of those were genuine lead-mark-goal goals. I thought at the time that I'd seen enough to believe a breakthrough season at CHF wasn't far away. Interestingly, from the interview the other day, Hurley doesn't think that's far away either. He's determined, I'm a believer.
 

ghostdog

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Oct 18, 2008
Posts
5,071
Likes
1,778
Location
gondawanaland
AFL Club
Essendon
Ok I'm going to put this out there. This year is Hurley's last chance ....... to prove he can be as effective up forward as down back.

Hooker or Pears would make solid trades at the end of the year as we look to continue bolstering our small forward and attacking mid department.

This is 100% gut from me, I've got enough to know about that, but I'm just feeling it from him up forward at the moment. He's just not dominant up there and struggle to make the play. He seems at sixes or sevens where to position himself and for someone as good as he is one on one he seems to second guess whether to attack the ball or try to slip out the back.

Hopefully it is just mental and he can sort it out soon but playing back he just seems very natural/relaxed and positions himself well and from there attacks the ball with confidence.

It is counter intuitive but he's far more attacking when playing in defense and having him there, especially post Fletch, will see us able to be a more attacking side as well as surer down back. Hurley, Carlisle, Pears, Hibberd and Dempsey makes for a lot of very good ball movement out of the back half, especially if Heppell and Goddard are rotating through there. It also means that we can carry Hardingham's shaky disposal.

Another year under Daniher's belt, Crameri and resting ruck might be enough marking up forward.

I would still persist with Hurley up forward this year but I'm starting to think it might be a waste of his talents.
I see your point re: a surer backline that includes Hurley, but to say this year is his last chance is being a bit premature. The guy's only 22. Post-Fletch, Hurley, Carlisle, Pears, Hibberd and Dempsey looks awesome.
 

fishardansin

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Apr 6, 2008
Posts
15,185
Likes
10,106
Location
coburg
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Australian cricket team
I see your point re: a surer backline that includes Hurley, but to say this year is his last chance is being a bit premature. The guy's only 22. Post-Fletch, Hurley, Carlisle, Pears, Hibberd and Dempsey looks awesome.
My main point is actually that I'm not sure that Hurley is going to be consistent quality up forward, yet he'll be a star of the game down back.

Right now we need him to do his best up forward. In a years time Daniher, Gumby, Crameri and two rucks capable of spending lots of game time up forward and Fletch retired might mean we'll need him back.

If he does end up a backman playing forward for a few seasons wont necessarily be a bad thing for his long term development as a back though. Playing on the best in the business will help him learn off them and also having played forward he'll have a better understanding of what positioning by a backman is worst to play on.
 

ghostdog

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Oct 18, 2008
Posts
5,071
Likes
1,778
Location
gondawanaland
AFL Club
Essendon
My main point is actually that I'm not sure that Hurley is going to be consistent quality up forward, yet he'll be a star of the game down back.

Right now we need him to do his best up forward. In a years time Daniher, Gumby, Crameri and two rucks capable of spending lots of game time up forward and Fletch retired might mean we'll need him back.

If he does end up a backman playing forward for a few seasons wont necessarily be a bad thing for his long term development as a back though. Playing on the best in the business will help him learn off them and also having played forward he'll have a better understanding of what positioning by a backman is worst to play on.
I'd be applying Murphy's law to Gumby tbh. He's only been given a one year contract - I'd say he's considered a gap filler. Hurley will probably be forward for at least a couple of seasons. Perhaps we'll trade or free-agency purchase our way to a more solid forward line.

I think Hurley only just started to show he understands the role last season.
 

gPhonque

Premiership Player
Joined
May 24, 2001
Posts
3,759
Likes
513
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Essendon
This argument is getting old, but no less important at the same time... so my 2c:

I just don't get why we are persevering with Hurley up forward when he could be, IMO, the best backman in the land if left down there. (and before you start screaming stuff about "team balance", read the rest of my post first)

Even IF Hurley gets it together down forward, I still doubt that he'd be in the top 10 forwards in the competition... and in fact, he won't even be OUR best forward if JD is half as good as we hope he'll be.

The thing I find funny is that this whole "Hurley forward" thing is based on one quarter of football against Hawthorn.

Actually, no... it's based on 2 kicks. He kicks a couple of great goals and people start jumping up and down talking about "the next Carey" and all sorts of rubbish.

But really, apart from a couple of decent weeks last year, what else has Hurley done down forward? Yes, he attacks the contest... but he does that even better down back. I really feel that we're wasting his career up forward. Imagine the backman he'd be now if he'd played the last 3 years down there? Scary. And in a side that has leaked goals like no other during that time... well...

Hell, even Reimers kicked as many goals in the same amount of games as Hurley. And if people don't believe that goals are important when it comes to judging power forwards who are the F50 target more often than not, then they're kidding themselves.

With Fletch on his way out one day (maybe!) and JD on his way in (with Gumby also a possibility... along with Ryder and Bellchambers pinch hitting down forward) it's a no-brainer that Hurley plays down back where he is infinitely more relaxed, comfortable, and confident... and, dare I say, where the team need him most considering that the jury is still well and truly out on Hooker, Pears, and Carlisle.

All this is not to say that I don't think he should EVER play forward. I'm not saying that at all. But I think he should be primarily our key back who can pinch hit down forward when needed... rather the the other way around as it is now.
 

fishardansin

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Apr 6, 2008
Posts
15,185
Likes
10,106
Location
coburg
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Australian cricket team
I've slowly come to agree with the position of gPhonque on this. My reasoning for him being a gun CHF was not about all about that half against Hawthorn. It was more about the fact that he's a big powerful competitive beast. This attributes added with his skill make for an exciting big forward. However, I'm letting that go as I'm not impressed by his positioning or his decisions regards working a player under the ball or going straight for it. I think he often choses the wrong option one out up forward, but these options are the right one for a backman, i.e. he's more about killing the contest and if he doesn't win the ball it goes to a spot that's not dangerous. This is exactly what you want from a backman.

There is still time for him to change his instincts on this up forward though.
 
Top Bottom