- Sep 6, 2005
- 144,886
- 94,756
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Thread starter
- #2,176
Do we blame Pete Carroll or Russell Wilson for that call of a pass play and an INT vs the Pats?
NFL (19/20) Super Bowl LIV: Kansas City Chiefs vs San Francisco 49ers
- Thread starter Exe Gesis
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Feb 25, 2013
- 51,203
- 58,247
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
We say well done Malcolm Butler/Pats coaches for studying the film and making the big time play at the big time moment.
- Sep 6, 2005
- 144,886
- 94,756
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Thread starter
- #2,178
no...
we blame carroll for a bad play call
we blame wilson for telegraphing it or not checking out of the play
we credit butler for reading it.
we apportion cause and effect to all parties involved directly in that play.
- Feb 25, 2013
- 51,203
- 58,247
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
- Sep 6, 2005
- 144,886
- 94,756
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Thread starter
- #2,180
lol, no one in the world thinks it was a good play call...not even carroll. since then the entire nfl community agrees they shouldve run lynch once, twice, three times.
- Feb 25, 2013
- 51,203
- 58,247
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
That's wrong. Plenty of people think it was good play call. The game situation in itself determines that it was good play call. Maximising your opportunities to score and win.
The people saying it was a bad call are the casual fans who only know a handful of names, one of them being Marshawn Lynch
I'm not surprised that you say it was a bad play call tho. Mr. 3 yards and a cloud of dust is efficient football.
- Feb 25, 2013
- 51,203
- 58,247
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
Also Carroll did not say it was a bad play call. He said it was the worst result to a play call and would've been a great play call if they caught it... But you keep bringing up fake news (as I said, highly intelligent computer, but your NFL knowledge is poor)
It's the same typical stuff that we always see tho. Reactionary people (i.e. low intelligence) going crazy over results, but not taking the time to look into the actions that brought about the results. Just because you had a bad result does not mean the action was poor. Such a simple thing to grasp yet so many people too stupid to understand that
It's the same typical stuff that we always see tho. Reactionary people (i.e. low intelligence) going crazy over results, but not taking the time to look into the actions that brought about the results. Just because you had a bad result does not mean the action was poor. Such a simple thing to grasp yet so many people too stupid to understand that
quotemokc
Brownlow Medallist
Didn't Lynch have like a 10 yard run the play before?
I was rooting for the Pats that game and I amongst all others in the room thought rushing the ball was going to be game over.
I was rooting for the Pats that game and I amongst all others in the room thought rushing the ball was going to be game over.
- Feb 25, 2013
- 51,203
- 58,247
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
Lynch was getting stuffed on short yardage situations all game
- Sep 6, 2005
- 144,886
- 94,756
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Thread starter
- #2,185
lol, so many awful things said in those last two posts LA.
- Feb 25, 2013
- 51,203
- 58,247
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
Awful in the sense that the truth hurts?
- Sep 6, 2005
- 144,886
- 94,756
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Thread starter
- #2,187
your take is just a poor spin
- Feb 25, 2013
- 51,203
- 58,247
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
Regardless. That game has nothing to do with this game and you're trying to hide the fact that you're wrong
- Sep 6, 2005
- 144,886
- 94,756
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Thread starter
- #2,189
Listen, son.
- Feb 21, 2006
- 20,731
- 19,578
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Turtles, NYJets, Celtics, Tottenham
It's both. Credit to KC/Jones and point the finger at Shanahan/Garoppolo. Those two things aren't mutually exclusive.
- Feb 25, 2013
- 51,203
- 58,247
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
But you can't even give me one thing Shanahan did wrong yet.
- Sep 6, 2005
- 144,886
- 94,756
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Thread starter
- #2,192
we have, you just dont want to acknowledge.
- Feb 25, 2013
- 51,203
- 58,247
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
What was the reason? That he didn't tell Jimmy G to not check out of that specific play on 2nd and 5 no matter what defense KC were playing?
A11dAtP0w3R
Dumpster Fire Diver
- Oct 18, 2013
- 89,103
- 125,365
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Carolina Panthers
This is what happens when a thread remains stickied too long, descends into utter chaos over analysing every moment of this one and other completely irrelevant superbowls.
- Sep 6, 2005
- 144,886
- 94,756
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Thread starter
- #2,195
not running the ball a bit more
- Sep 6, 2005
- 144,886
- 94,756
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Thread starter
- #2,196
LA has to have the last word then it can be closed
- Feb 25, 2013
- 51,203
- 58,247
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
Agreed. Just give KC credit and move on noobs. BTW this certifies the fact that GG.exe is still a Raider through and through. Too salty to just say well done to KC and get over it.
A11dAtP0w3R
Dumpster Fire Diver
- Oct 18, 2013
- 89,103
- 125,365
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Carolina Panthers
So he should after wiping your carcass all over it during the week.
- Feb 25, 2013
- 51,203
- 58,247
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
That makes no sense to anyone with an IQ above 80. You have to give specific plays where they should've run the ball and you haven't been able to do that (either because you dont know the facts of the game or just don't know how football works)
- Sep 6, 2005
- 144,886
- 94,756
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Thread starter
- #2,200
ok LA got his last word in (belittle another and boost himself)....now we can lock it.
Similar threads
- Poll
