- Oct 27, 2007
- 11,471
- 13,227
- AFL Club
- Sydney
Oh, I agree. But that saga is in the past, it’s the flow on effect that now pisses me off. It’s like being the eldest in the family where you can’t do anything you want but over time, the youngest gets away with everything!10% divided among 44 players is the same as 10% among 2. It's utter bull about the farce because it's still the same. How is it any different to another club paying 2 players a big chunk of the salary cap? Anyway I don't disagree with it being removed but I believe the older contracts should have been grandfathered rather than the cost being absorbed by the Swans.