Lore
Moderator ❀
- Dec 14, 2015
- 48,922
- 73,346
- AFL Club
- Essendon
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

I'll make sure I keep questioning his ability here then. Looks to have done the trick. You're all welcomeLooked angry at times, hopefully it continues.

I want to get excited when I see our players being aggressive but these days I'm more worried it ends in 50s or suspensions.
If he puts up a performance like he did last night every week then he has well and truely exceed his expectations
Yeah I can get around that until he gets rubbed out for this statement of intent(ional, high, medium).It's not really my thing but with Wright his physical intensity and willingness to impose himself on a contest (using that incredible rig he has) has been an issue.
I like to think of it as a statement of intent.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Yeah I can get around that until he gets rubbed out for this statement of intent(ional, high, medium).
Was 2014 a strong draft? Thought it was weak as piss.Or just realised the talent which saw him take at 8 in a really strong draft.
Petracca, Brayshaw, De Goey, Moore, Duggan, McLean, Touk Miller, Maynard, Daniel, Dougal Howard, Andrews, not to mention Waterman and LangfordWas 2014 a strong draft? Thought it was weak as piss.
Alec Waterman who hasn’t played a senior game is evidence of a strong draft?Petracca, Brayshaw, De Goey, Moore, Duggan, McLean, Touk Miller, Maynard, Daniel, Dougal Howard, Andrews, not to mention Waterman and Langford
I was attempting to take the piss with him.Alec Waterman who hasn’t played a senior game is evidence of a strong draft?
As for the others, all drafts post 2000 have a handful of decent players. It’s definitely weak compared to other contemporary drafts.
Yep. Hooker would move into defence in that scenarioIf Stringer's fit can't see him and Hooksy and "H" in the forward line
i got it mate.I was attempting to take the piss with him.
The bed part was weird lol![]()
He’s not the new Joe Daniher, but might be the new Peter Wright
Two metres, two clubs. Peter the Wright man for the Bombers after Joe – and he is keen to show he is also his own man.www.theage.com.au
I found it eye openingThe bed part was weird lol
Obviously now it’s the future and Big Footy is most people’s main news source, The Age can no longer pay for copy editing![]()
He’s not the new Joe Daniher, but might be the new Peter Wright
Two metres, two clubs. Peter the Wright man for the Bombers after Joe – and he is keen to show he is also his own man.www.theage.com.au
Quotes like "Peter Wright is a footballer, who is called Peter Wright" and then going around in circles seems about right for something lifted from BigFooty.Obviously now it’s the future and Big Footy is most people’s main news source, The Age can no longer pay for copy editing
He is an ok writer with a nice perspective. This article just needed an editor to do a decent job. The tone weirdly fluctuates and the whole thing could be half the length and say the same thing.Gleeson is a good writer, no sure what the big deal is. Most footballers are boring as batshit, a little personal anecdote doesn’t hurt