Draft Review 2006 - Redo the 2006 Draft

Remove this Banner Ad

Tippet above Gibbs, Riewoldt and others? Tippet is ridiculously overrated. No way the 7th best player in the draft.

1. Joel Selwood - I hate this campaigner but no doubt one of the best players in the league.

2. Travis Boak - Respect this campaigner and again an easy lock for 2nd.

3. Josh Kennedy - Shown more in his career to slightly edge out Gray.

4. Robbie Gray - Shot up the ranks through one season. I'd back him in to repeat it in 2015.

5. Eric Mackenzie - Has played defence in both good and bad WCE teams and has performed to an elite standard in both. Has performed A Grade longer than Gibbs to just edge him out.

6. Bryce Gibbs - Has always been a consistent player in a s**t and mediocre team. Has only just turned 25 (bottom ager) and is hitting his straps.

7. Tom Hawkins - Don't rate the fat s**t as much as others. Has played both main and 2nd forward in arguably the best AFL team in the modern era. Wouldn't have the hardest job in football.

8. Jack Riewoldt - Whinging gay campaigner but quality forward.

9. Todd Goldstein - One of the games premium rucks. But you wouldn't take him ahead of any of the previous 8.

10. James Frawley - Would walk away with a quality FB at pick 10 anyday. Should look 10 fold better at Hawthorn next year then the AFL graveyard Melshit.


Not including the F/S selections the top 10 would be as follows...
1. Carlton - Joel Selwood
2. Essendon* - Travis Boak
3. Kangaroos - Robbie Gray
4. Brisbane Lions - Eric Mackenzie
5. Port Adelaide - Bryce Gibbs
6. Hawthorn - Jack Riewoldt
7. Geelong - Todd Goldstein
8. Collingwood - James Frawley
9. St Kilda - Kurt Tippett
10. Collingwood - Justin Westoff

No way Boak is above JPK.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Tippet above Gibbs, Riewoldt and others? Tippet is ridiculously overrated. No way the 7th best player in the draft.

1. Joel Selwood - I hate this campaigner but no doubt one of the best players in the league.

2. Travis Boak - Respect this campaigner and again an easy lock for 2nd.

3. Josh Kennedy - Shown more in his career to slightly edge out Gray.

4. Robbie Gray - Shot up the ranks through one season. I'd back him in to repeat it in 2015.

5. Eric Mackenzie - Has played defence in both good and bad WCE teams and has performed to an elite standard in both. Has performed A Grade longer than Gibbs to just edge him out.

6. Bryce Gibbs - Has always been a consistent player in a s**t and mediocre team. Has only just turned 25 (bottom ager) and is hitting his straps.

7. Tom Hawkins - Don't rate the fat s**t as much as others. Has played both main and 2nd forward in arguably the best AFL team in the modern era. Wouldn't have the hardest job in football.

8. Jack Riewoldt - Whinging gay campaigner but quality forward.

9. Todd Goldstein - One of the games premium rucks. But you wouldn't take him ahead of any of the previous 8.

10. James Frawley - Would walk away with a quality FB at pick 10 anyday. Should look 10 fold better at Hawthorn next year then the AFL graveyard Melshit.


Not including the F/S selections the top 10 would be as follows...
1. Carlton - Joel Selwood
2. Essendon* - Travis Boak
3. Kangaroos - Robbie Gray
4. Brisbane Lions - Eric Mackenzie
5. Port Adelaide - Bryce Gibbs
6. Hawthorn - Jack Riewoldt
7. Geelong - Todd Goldstein
8. Collingwood - James Frawley
9. St Kilda - Kurt Tippett
10. Collingwood - Justin Westoff
I would take Goldstein before Gibbs. Goldy has made 2 AA squads and just finished 2nd in the B&F of a top 4 side. Which has to be rated higher than winning a B&F in a team that finished 13th.
 
Goldstein has done more than Gibbs but he would edge him in talent and possibly by end of career. Gibbs hasn't really done much so far apart from improving on his consistency this year.

You always (should) rate KPFs high, regardless of your opinion on them, they don't grow on trees, especially good ones.
 
1-25

Joel Selwood
Travis Boak
Robbie Gray
Josh Kennedy
Tom Hawkins
Eric Mackenzie
Kurt Tippett
Bryce Gibbs
Todd Goldstein
Jack Riewoldt
Justin Westhoff
Matthew Leuenberger
Tom Lonergan
James Frawley
Sam Jacobs
Ben Reid
Nick Smith
Colin Garland
David Armitage
Jarrod Harbrow
Bachar Houli
Matt Suckling
Lindsay Thomas
Shane Edwards
Lachlan Hansen

Lonergan really shouldn't be considered. Including him is the equivalent of including a rookie promotion. He was drafted in 2002, suffered a career threatening injury in 2006 and was understandably retained as a rookie while he made his comeback.
 
Lonergan really shouldn't be considered. Including him is the equivalent of including a rookie promotion. He was drafted in 2002, suffered a career threatening injury in 2006 and was understandably retained as a rookie while he made his comeback.
Fair enough, hard to tell with some of these player that get re-rookied.
 
In retrospect a great draft for the Tigers. Our first two picks in Jack Riewoldt and Shane Edwards were steals at where we got them and, while our late picks were all duds, we've managed to trade in Houli and Grigg (Pettard as well but he's not that great a steal). Port did really well with Robbie Gray at 55 and Westhoff at 71. Essendon had a shocker!
 
Goldstein has done more than Gibbs but he would edge him in talent and possibly by end of career. Gibbs hasn't really done much so far apart from improving on his consistency this year.

You always (should) rate KPFs high, regardless of your opinion on them, they don't grow on trees, especially good ones.
Goldstein isnt a KPF though...
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Goldstein isnt a KPF though...
Clearly not, probably meant to write 'KP' to encompass rucks,kpf/kpd etc but it was ages ago. *shrug*

Probably push him high now, above E-Mac and shift Gray up a spot. Armitage too. Leuey probably sliding down the order unless he has a good back half of the season and/or goes to another team and becomes a decent #1 again.
 
Clearly not, probably meant to write 'KP' to encompass rucks,kpf/kpd etc but it was ages ago. *shrug*

Probably push him high now, above E-Mac and shift Gray up a spot. Armitage too. Leuey probably sliding down the order unless he has a good back half of the season and/or goes to another team and becomes a decent #1 again.
I'd argue mids are more valuable than the ruckman that feed it to them.

I.e Hawthorn who have flourished despite awful ruckman for the last decade
 
The elite players of the game may always be seen as midfielders but positionally it's a lot harder to find an elite player in the other specialised positions.

One example doesn't change that. Where would Freo be without Sandilands? Mumford at Sydney, Cox at West Coast etc
 
The elite players of the game may always be seen as midfielders but positionally it's a lot harder to find an elite player in the other specialised positions.

One example doesn't change that. Where would Freo be without Sandilands? Mumford at Sydney, Cox at West Coast etc

You simply cannot say Ruckman are more important than Midfielders and those examples prove it.

Freo havent won anything especially when Sandi was at his most dominant. They are in their best form now off the back of Fyfe, Neale, Hill, Mundy and Barlow despite Sandi being no where near his best.

Cox was feeding it down to Judd Cousins and Kerr when he won his premiership and Cox is hardly a ruckman anyway but more of a freak of nature - unlike Goldstein

Mummy feeding it down to JPK, Hannebery, Jack etc, if you put the Essendon midfield at his feet Mummy's team would get smashed.

Ruckman is one of the few positions that you do not need a superstar. It certainly helps, but a ruckman cannot be "franchise" player like a Key Forward or a Mid can be. The excellent ruckman these days are the ones that can move around the ground and get marks and play as a second midfielder where possible - see S.Martin, Cox, Kreuzer, Naitanui those types of mobile ruckman. Traditional ruckman like Goldstein and Jacobs are still very good ruckman who excel at ruckwork getting key marks on the wings and dropping forward where required but you cant say they are more important than midfielders.

It doesnt matter how good the tap is if the midfielder gets beaten at ground level it will get sharked by the other team.
 
You simply cannot say Ruckman are more important than Midfielders and those examples prove it.

Freo havent won anything especially when Sandi was at his most dominant. They are in their best form now off the back of Fyfe, Neale, Hill, Mundy and Barlow despite Sandi being no where near his best.

Cox was feeding it down to Judd Cousins and Kerr when he won his premiership and Cox is hardly a ruckman anyway but more of a freak of nature - unlike Goldstein

Mummy feeding it down to JPK, Hannebery, Jack etc, if you put the Essendon midfield at his feet Mummy's team would get smashed.

Ruckman is one of the few positions that you do not need a superstar. It certainly helps, but a ruckman cannot be "franchise" player like a Key Forward or a Mid can be. The excellent ruckman these days are the ones that can move around the ground and get marks and play as a second midfielder where possible - see S.Martin, Cox, Kreuzer, Naitanui those types of mobile ruckman. Traditional ruckman like Goldstein and Jacobs are still very good ruckman who excel at ruckwork getting key marks on the wings and dropping forward where required but you cant say they are more important than midfielders.

It doesnt matter how good the tap is if the midfielder gets beaten at ground level it will get sharked by the other team.

I disagree. Think you're coming from a conclusion and then working backwards to justify it. Fact is there are always more midfielders in a team and less the specialised positions. Anyway, expect we're not going to agree so happy to leave it there.
 
Geez west coast did well in this. Schoey and eMac are two very high quality defenders.
 
You simply cannot say Ruckman are more important than Midfielders and those examples prove it.

Freo havent won anything especially when Sandi was at his most dominant. They are in their best form now off the back of Fyfe, Neale, Hill, Mundy and Barlow despite Sandi being no where near his best.

Cox was feeding it down to Judd Cousins and Kerr when he won his premiership and Cox is hardly a ruckman anyway but more of a freak of nature - unlike Goldstein

Mummy feeding it down to JPK, Hannebery, Jack etc, if you put the Essendon midfield at his feet Mummy's team would get smashed.

Ruckman is one of the few positions that you do not need a superstar. It certainly helps, but a ruckman cannot be "franchise" player like a Key Forward or a Mid can be. The excellent ruckman these days are the ones that can move around the ground and get marks and play as a second midfielder where possible - see S.Martin, Cox, Kreuzer, Naitanui those types of mobile ruckman. Traditional ruckman like Goldstein and Jacobs are still very good ruckman who excel at ruckwork getting key marks on the wings and dropping forward where required but you cant say they are more important than midfielders.

It doesnt matter how good the tap is if the midfielder gets beaten at ground level it will get sharked by the other team.
I think the top end rucks can make a massive difference. Nic Nat v the dogs on the weekend. Goldy and Nic Nat v essendon.

If you don't have a ruck to compete against the best you won't win many games.

We don't play finals in 2015 without Goldy.
 
I think the top end rucks can make a massive difference. Nic Nat v the dogs on the weekend. Goldy and Nic Nat v essendon.

If you don't have a ruck to compete against the best you won't win many games.

We don't play finals in 2015 without Goldy.
Goldy is a star, no question about that, and yeah he has carried you to the finals, but that will be as far as he get's you. Top 8 is one thing, top 4 and a prelim/grandfinal on the back of a ruckman is another.

Great midfields can suceed without great ruckman, great ruckman cannot succeed without great midfields.

Look at the St Kilda grand final sides, the Sydney premeirs with Pyke as their ruckman, even Hawthords ruck stocks have been very average over this period.

Dal Santo, Montagna, Hayes... an ancient Gardiner
Pendles, Swan, Sidebottom, Daisy... Darren Jolly
Hodge, Lewis, Mitchell, Burgoyne... Hale & Baileyl
Kennedy, Hannebery, McVeigh, Parker, Jack... Pyke

Look at where the best ruckman in those years were playing.
2010 (Jolly v Gardy) - Sandi (6th) Cox (16th)
2013 (Hale & Bailey v Sandi) - Sandi (2nd) Jacobs (11th) Minson (AA 15th)
2014 (Pyke v Hale) - Sandi (AA 4th) Martin (15th) Lobbe (5th) Mumford (16th) Goldy (6th)

The best ruckman who have won premierships have probably been Mumford in 2012 (subsequently had a very good Sydney Midfield to work with) and then back to Cox in the Eagles days maybe? (who also had an all time great midfield)
 
I think the top end rucks can make a massive difference. Nic Nat v the dogs on the weekend. Goldy and Nic Nat v essendon.

If you don't have a ruck to compete against the best you won't win many games.

We don't play finals in 2015 without Goldy.
Hawks the biggest exception. Imagine them with a Goldstein?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top