- Thread starter
- #226
O'Brien is in the next 5, Shaw not too close. I haven't rated him as highly as others this year. Shaw would probably be in the 60's. Didak could probably go up above Sandilands but that's it imo. Only because he has missed games. Presti is probably too high.Good work AG, damn hard thing to do.
From a Collingwood POV, Davis, Presti, probably too high. Didak too low imo. I know he's missed a fair few games but has had so many BOG's to make up for it. I guess it comes down to how you judge it. Shaw and O'Brien must be very, very close.
Hurn and Jackson are right on the edge. My next 5 are Stanton, Hurn, O'Brien, Jackson and Morris/Bock.Imo, Didak a bit too low, Mitchell a tad high, Goodes should be top 10, and Hurn and Jackson very very stiff.
I also think everyone is overrating Presti a bit. He's been great at his role but his game is just so one-dimensional I would prefer him in the 40-45 range. Just my thoughts though, a very credible and well-thought out list.
Goodes is about right but I could move Davis down two. Mitchell is a hard one because he was inconsistent early but Fev and Pendlebury could be put above him. I'll move Presti down to the 40's because I sort of agree with the one dimensional part.