Dogs_r_barking
Premiers 2016
- Thread starter
- #151
I
Yeah, never saw him in the flesh would have like to have...Beeeaaaassssaaaaaaaa 18
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Yeah, never saw him in the flesh would have like to have...Beeeaaaassssaaaaaaaa 18
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Well Redpath is a natural FF, super strong, contests, quick to lead and a good kick, i think its just the rest of his game that needs improvement. i think the reason they don't put Tom Hill in the 22 is because they use him as a ruck mostly at willy and the fact we are already playing 3 makes it hardI think Cordy is more of a resting ruck who can play forward better than most, if that makes sense.
T Hill we havent seen enough of yet but I really want to see him and Redpath is making big improvements and has unlimited potential, so hopefully one of them works.
Well Redpath is a natural FF, super strong, contests, quick to lead and a good kick, i think its just the rest of his game that needs improvement. i think the reason they don't put Tom Hill in the 22 is because they use him as a ruck mostly at willy and the fact we are already playing 3 makes it hard
Yep I'm with you 110% on that i want Tom at FF he to is a naturalYeah I agree Redpath could be anything! But I dont like Hill playing ruck tbh, he is not a ruckman and is only playing there because Cordy and Roughy are in the seniors and Campbell is injured. We need to play the kid forward so we can see what he can do there!!!
Yeah i agree with out fading defence but when Lake goes Marko can hold at FB but id put some muscle on his arms. we still have Williams, Aussie, Fletch and even Panos if needI like Hill and cordy. Redpath has a bit to work with as well. They've all got question marks over them though. This includes Jones, Grant and Panos. Perhaps the one with the least question marks is Hill but he hasn't been given a shot yet and might not be ready.
That being said I actually think our tall forwards will be fine over time. Not stars but serviceable. What we really need is pace and skills through the midfield AND up forward. Also our defence is getting older by the minute. I'd be focussing on getting a good KPD before trying to draft another KPF.
I do have faith at least one of Roberts/Talia will become an AFL quality defender though.
yepI dont think we have any massive gaps any more really, everywhere has at least serviceable coverage, we just need pace and skill throughout the team (especially midfield though)
He certainly has pace, but I have yet to see him play as a forward, only as half back or mid. Therefore I have no idea as yet, as to either his goal sense or accuracy. He may develop into an option, but I would still love to see us with one of those pure natural small forwards. Even if JJ can fulfil that role, not a lot of harm having a couple on the list.I think JJ could be perfect for that position but maybe even move into mid like Dahl!
He certainly has pace, but I have yet to see him play as a forward, only as half back or mid. Therefore I have no idea as yet, as to either his goal sense or accuracy. He may develop into an option, but I would still love to see us with one of those pure natural small forwards. Even if JJ can fulfil that role, not a lot of harm having a couple on the list.
He'd be a very good get. If Port finish lower than us, can't see them passing on him though.Hope we get Toumpas, he will be like Dal, starting off as a tricky little small forward, but with more class by the sounds of it. Then graduate to the midfield.