Stringer taken by Geelong today/late yesterdayWhat about this Jake Stringer character??? Have I asked this question before?![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Stringer taken by Geelong today/late yesterdayWhat about this Jake Stringer character??? Have I asked this question before?![]()
Stringer taken by Geelong today/late yesterday
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I wonder if there's any chance Stringer or Shaw could slide to 23. I think probably not with Stringer, but perhaps with Shaw.
In terms of Qlders, outside of the high profile group of Boston, Cameron and Bourke - a few others who might be a chance for rookie spots. What are the rules for Qld rookies this year?- alternate selections with Gold Coast or based on academy areas (or is this only from next year?).
Wallin interesting one - overage this yr in state 18's as injured last yr and did well there and in NEAFL but didn't get invited to state screening. Johnson also 19 - played forward and back in state 18's and at Morningside. He's over 190 cm - you didn't mean Wyld as somewhat shorter (188) KPD - played all 5 state games and several NEAFL games deep defence and did go to state screening. Wardle also 188 and went to state screening - played for Qld in defence,forward and in ruck, but NEAFL for Labrador mainly in defence.
Well Stringer's highlights are definitely impressive.
Well, Now I've done it again. Got my heart set on a player and well know I can kiss 'em goodbye. Wines or Stringer at 8 but I would be suprised if either of them were there. Big body brutes!
Yeah I think I would take the punt on Stringer at 8 if he was there. If it weren't for the leg, I think he'd be top 2 or 3.
That seems to be the mail. Is highly rated with the concern being about the leg. Melb, WB forums are pretty keen as well.
See, there's always a flipside... someone like Bartlett, where we did exactly that... huge talent, probably would've gone about pick 10 without injury concerns, and what happens? We recruit, we heal, he injures, we heal, he injures... and now he's on the pile of what is likely "we'll recontract him IF we can fit him"...I know this comparison can't be made every time there's a top 10 talent with injury worries, but if the Selwood case is anything to go by, the talent doesn't go away if you back your club to fix the injury.
See, there's always a flipside... someone like Bartlett, where we did exactly that... huge talent, probably would've gone about pick 10 without injury concerns, and what happens? We recruit, we heal, he injures, we heal, he injures... and now he's on the pile of what is likely "we'll recontract him IF we can fit him"...
With Stringer, I don't know the answer to (1) and (2) but broken legs seem to be very difficult to achieve full recovery from which makes me worry about (3). That's not to say that he won't recover fully or that he won't be able to compensate for any loss of athleticism. Plenty have made a recovery and gone on to play good quality footy. There have been a few though who have never been the same player.
As I said, I don't know enough about the injury and all clubs would be doing their due diligence. But it has me worried and, if we draft him, I'll remain worried until I get the chance to see him in a game situation.
Not so sure about that POBT, but it all depends on the severity/type of the fracture and whether the bone has united properly etc.
I guess you're thinking about guys like Vossy and Goose, but I haven't checked on what happened to Stringer
My impression is that the issue as to whether or not Stringer's fracture has healed well should be pretty apparent from his x-rays/scans, which would be available for scrutiny by club medicos, and his form since returning to the playing field. No doubt there will be Drs fom several clubs checking him out, presumably including ours.
Sorry Judge, I didn't mean to be so general.

Shouldn't that be "I'm sorry Your Honour"?![]()
From memory Voss said with his it took 2 years to get over it.
From memory Voss said with his it took 2 years to get over it. He could play after 1 year but his training was very limited as he still had pain in the leg. I would say with a major break or fracture developing sore spots would be the main ongoing concern.
Agree, if u are deciding whether to draft high talent with it, you would have to back them in I think. Would have to do some knowing u r more so drafting a player to play in a few years,with little on the short term.That wouldn't be a concern for us. How we think he will perform over 10 years is what we will assess him on.
No I definately meant Johnson. He is listed at 191 which is a height I still worry about nws it is the same height as Michael etc. Wyld did very well at the Champs in a KPD role but at 188 I would struggle to take him. Johnson similarly good defensively and I think better going forward.