When I think of Garlett, I think back to what the pre-draft talk was surrounding Yarran in 2008... I can see similarities, and I am more than happy we took the punt, then again, I'm not certain Yarran had anywhere near the same issues as Garlett.
I think clubs with early selections will play it safe and overlook him, despite is obvious ability. I can see him ending up at Collingwood with one of their late first round selections.
In saying the above though, I would be more than happy to select him at Pick #11, because I think that given our professional environment/set up along with the likes of Jeffy, Yaz and Eddie - we could get the best out of Dayle.... it's just a matter as to whether SR believes that Dayle could possibly get the worst out Yaz, Eddie and Jeffy... I guess? (if that makes any sense?).
He would be fantastic for us, playing as a "super sub" (given his current endurance) and just breaking away from the packs, evading opponents and being able to hit up our leading forwards with good disposal, might even allow Armfield to play as a more permanent lock down forward.
Like I've said all along - I'd be more confident of selecting Garlett if we had of secured Andrew McLeod. But I still firmly believe we should pick him, because natural talent is too dangerous to ignore, and our position on the ladder this year is not reflective of the current list we have (thanks to injuries) - so we should see this as a bonus addition.
A beep test of 12 is something similar to what Yarran would have had when he first came to the club ... but then again, he wasn't touted to be a full time midfielder straight away.