Remove this Banner Ad

Opinion 2012 draft thread.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sin City
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

How's Tomlinson tracking at GWS? Not sure they'd like to only have Davis (very good KPP) to be supported by only Mohr. They might have a look at Clurey is my thinking.
Plowman ;)

Tomlinson is good but it'd be nice to have the option to have him as a swingman hey zee, rather then forced into KPD full time.

Does Clurey suit their contested style? Zones a fair way off and gets caught short on the lead a lot like Bower used to.
 
Plowman ;)

Tomlinson is good but it'd be nice to have the option to have him as a swingman hey zee, rather then forced into KPD full time.

Does Clurey suit their contested style? Zones a fair way off and gets caught short on the lead a lot like Bower used to.
Plowman would be their superior Jeremy Laidler type, but just a tad short for KPD maybe?

Tomlinson might look elsewhere when his contract is up and he can't get a look in over the Cameron and Patton.

GWS' side is scary, absolutely terrifying.
 
Does Clurey suit their contested style? Zones a fair way off and gets caught short on the lead a lot like Bower used to.

Reading Clurey's profile, he reminded me of Bower too - but in a good way before injuries derailed emu's confidence. That he would he slide to 36... ;)
 
Plowman would be their superior Jeremy Laidler type, but just a tad short for KPD maybe?

Tomlinson might look elsewhere when his contract is up and he can't get a look in over the Cameron and Patton.

GWS' side is scary, absolutely terrifying.
Plowman won't be playing deep in defence on Daniher, Casboult or Tippett but as far as playing CHB he's going to be able to stick with anyone on the lead and match them for body strength.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I'm starting to warm to Kennedy. I don't really care about his position or his height - he just seems like a hard, fast, ball-winning footballer. Every team could use someone like that.

And I'm getting cold feet on my boy Stringer.
 
If Grundy is passed up by GWS, Melbourne and Bulldogs both need ruck stocks and he is the best ruck prospect by a street. He won't make Richmond let alone outside the Top 15. Having said that GWS need rucks as well now they have delisted Brogan to fit in Tippett.

If Stringer makes it to #11, I cannot see him being passed up. If he gets picked up early, we need another mid or Plowman. Just not Macrae. He's going to be this years bust. Still like Lonergan, but won't mind if it's Stringer.
 
I'm starting to warm to Kennedy. I don't really care about his position or his height - he just seems like a hard, fast, ball-winning footballer. Every team could use someone like that.

And I'm getting cold feet on my boy Stringer.

I'm on this bandwagon. A smart footballer who honestly should be top 10 except for his height.
 
Did you see his VFL form late in the season where he was very very good! was in the top bendigo players each week. His endurance may not be back yet but his footballing ability is still very much there as evident by this form
They can have Stringer if we can get Mayes who has played senior footy in the SANFL and is healthy.

http://www.nafc.com.au/seniorfootball/players/smayes.aspx?popup=true&..
I would've loved to play alongside: Chris Judd
http://www.nafc.com.au/seniorfootball/players/smayes.aspx?popup=true&..

Unless Toumpas slides, then the Dogs will probably be the spoiler and get a young Ryan Griffen.

Port could still pass on Grundy if Mayes is available.

You can see Mick moving Mayes into the middle like he did with Pendlebury and Thomas.

Seems a good fit for Rogers' speed is King comment.
 
I'm starting to warm to Kennedy. I don't really care about his position or his height - he just seems like a hard, fast, ball-winning footballer. Every team could use someone like that.

And I'm getting cold feet on my boy Stringer.

This ... im back on the Kennedy bandwagon.
 
just saw footage of ben kennedy, geez looks to be a handy player and future star.

if stringer is not available or blues dont pick him up, would like blues to get kennedy. with too many inside midfielders at the helm it would help murphy, simpson and judd
 
Judd & Joel Selwood are two obvious examples of why it could be dangerous to rule an extremely talented player out because of previous injuries.

Oh+I+see+you+have+a+repost+there+_922e03588f1f114a55bfd4c3bda95086.jpg
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Been thinking it over. Perfect draft:

Kennedy - Inside mid/small forward. Excels all round, only disadvantage is height. Typically I'd say small forwards are surplus to our needs, but Ben can and will be just as damaging up-field
O'Brien - Rangy tall forward with X-factor who'll add depth to our KPP in years to come. Probably a third tall forward at AFL level
Corr - Aggressive KPD who will almost certainly be gone by here. Versatile and athletic
Temay - Endurance athlete with a work ethic I love. I could live with him at our second pick. Reminds me of Carazzo in how he moves, probably would start as a HBF
 
Got the third round done on my phantom, have a look and let me know what you think :thumbsu:

Fantastic read, well done mate. :thumbsu:

Always love reading the mock drafts, even though there's little chance anyone will get close its always interesting to read the opinions of those who have seen these guys a fair bit.

In terms of your mock, If we ended up with Kennedy, Carter and Corr I would be thrilled. Of the players you have available I'd want Stringer, O'Rourke and Menzel before Kennedy, but that's just personal preference with little of substance to back it up. Regardless, I certainly wouldn't be upset with Kennedy who looks to be a pocket rocket.

Carter is the one I want with our second selection, and I've said as much for weeks now. We really do need a small defender, and he sounds like a very good option who is capable of adding to the midfield rotation in time as well.

We had a fantastic draft in 2010 with regards to taller players but I think we'll probably look to add another. Corr has been talked about as a solid option further up the order than what you have him so again, I'd be happy with that although I think a tall forward may be a higher priority rather than a defender.

One player I'm interested in asking you about us Jarrad Lienert. What are your thoughts on him? We probably don't need a player like him, but he's one I'm warming to on what I've read. Projects as a similar player to McInnes, with a more attacking nature. Would that be correct?
 
We should really consider drafting Ben Kennedy with our first pick then make Garlett play in the VFL for like the first 5 rounds of the 2013 season. With Kennedy playing all those rounds.
 
We should really consider drafting Ben Kennedy with our first pick then make Garlett play in the VFL for like the first 5 rounds of the 2013 season. With Kennedy playing all those rounds.

So much for playing them on their merits.

If Garlett is meeting expectations pre-season why wouldn't he start?

Is this one of those"play him in the twos to show him we don't need him" things which is meant to motivate players?
 
Dont rate Mayes as highly as other. Doesnt show enough aggression and drifts in and out of games to much.

How many games have you seen him, the reality is we are not going to pick the complete package, Garlett has some issues along with, Stringer who has a query on his body, if Mayes does happen to drop to pick 11, pretty sure we would be thrilled to pick up him, based on most experts he is expected to go in the 5-8 range.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Fantastic read, well done mate. :thumbsu:

Always love reading the mock drafts, even though there's little chance anyone will get close its always interesting to read the opinions of those who have seen these guys a fair bit.

In terms of your mock, If we ended up with Kennedy, Carter and Corr I would be thrilled. Of the players you have available I'd want Stringer, O'Rourke and Menzel before Kennedy, but that's just personal preference with little of substance to back it up. Regardless, I certainly wouldn't be upset with Kennedy who looks to be a pocket rocket.

Carter is the one I want with our second selection, and I've said as much for weeks now. We really do need a small defender, and he sounds like a very good option who is capable of adding to the midfield rotation in time as well.

We had a fantastic draft in 2010 with regards to taller players but I think we'll probably look to add another. Corr has been talked about as a solid option further up the order than what you have him so again, I'd be happy with that although I think a tall forward may be a higher priority rather than a defender.

One player I'm interested in asking you about us Jarrad Lienert. What are your thoughts on him? We probably don't need a player like him, but he's one I'm warming to on what I've read. Projects as a similar player to McInnes, with a more attacking nature. Would that be correct?
Cheers J, much appreciated mate :thumbsu:

I've been on about Carter for a while now. He's small but a nice player.

The reason I went with a defender rather than forward is that along with losing Bower and Thornton this year McCarthy moved forward towards the end of the season and did well and I could see him straying there as a roaming lead up type third tall.

Yeah Lienert does absolutely nothing for me. Gets out positioned or doesn't make good position, doesn't hit the contest in that desperate way McInnes does and not overly quick to play the style he tries to.
 
Does anyone think that kennedy could play as a small back pocket for his "apprenticeship"? fast and hard (which scares most small fowards) and a great kick (creating play out of defence)
plus this would also help develop the defensive side of his game.

a better version of aaron joesph???
 
Does anyone think that kennedy could play as a small back pocket for his "apprenticeship"? fast and hard (which scares most small fowards) and a great kick (creating play out of defence)
plus this would also help develop the defensive side of his game.

a better version of aaron joesph???
Perhaps not good enough in the air which coupled with his lack of height could make him a bit of a liability as many of the AFL's small forwards are excellent overhead marks.

Would produce some sizzling football combined with Yarran once the ball hit the ground though.
 
Does anyone think that kennedy could play as a small back pocket for his "apprenticeship"? fast and hard (which scares most small fowards) and a great kick (creating play out of defence)
plus this would also help develop the defensive side of his game.

a better version of aaron joesph???

I wouldn't.

Think we'd be hurting his development as he's more of an attacking style player, who size limitations make him unsuitable for a vast majority of opponents. He'll tear it up on the HFF
 
Cheers J, much appreciated mate :thumbsu:

I've been on about Carter for a while now. He's small but a nice player.

The reason I went with a defender rather than forward is that along with losing Bower and Thornton this year McCarthy moved forward towards the end of the season and did well and I could see him straying there as a roaming lead up type third tall.

Yeah Lienert does absolutely nothing for me. Gets out positioned or doesn't make good position, doesn't hit the contest in that desperate way McInnes does and not overly quick to play the style he tries to.




Cheers for the info.

Just interested - where do you get all your info ? Do you attend games, watch TV footage, word of mouth ?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top