Remove this Banner Ad

Opinion 2012 draft thread.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sin City
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Should Tippett go into the draft I see the top 10 going as:

Whitfield, Toumpas, Grundy, O'Rourke, Wines, Plowman, Mayes, Tippett, Macrae, Daniher.

Leaving us with the choice of Stringer, Garlett, Vlastuin, Kennedy, Garner, Jaksch, Menzel, Colquhoun, Lonergan.
 
Adam Marcon

2010 Draft Footage


Marcon just Received the 2012 Laurie Hill Trophy for the Best and Fairest for the Northern Blues
http://www.sportingpulse.com/assoc_page.cgi?client=1-118-0-0-0&&news_task=DETAIL&articleID=20940861

I couldn't find many stats on him but he did kick 8 goals in 10 Games at VFL Seniors level and 9 "Bests" whatever they are
http://www.sportingpulse.com/team_i...nt=1-118-10464-204557-16771076&ocompID=150677


Could he be a pick up in the Rookie Draft, or possible even a late pick in the National Draft if he nominates.

Wouldn't mind him at pick 71 if we could afford to payout either Davies, Curnow or Ellard to make room on the list.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

So we look like we are only use 3 pick (11, 36, 56 and not use 71 or 76) and upgrade 3 rookies and we finished 10th But Sydney won the flag and are having 8 picks with the last 3 being 103, 121 and 139. there first 5 picks are between 20 and 70. I'm not saying that what we are doing is wrong or we should cut player A, B or C but Sydney seem to be a head of everyone when it comes to developing players and picking talent. Are we going to look back at this draft and say we missed the boat or are we doing the right thing?
 
So we look like we are only use 3 pick (11, 36, 56 and not use 71 or 76) and upgrade 3 rookies and we finished 10th But Sydney won the flag and are having 8 picks with the last 3 being 103, 121 and 139. there first 5 picks are between 20 and 70. I'm not saying that what we are doing is wrong or we should cut player A, B or C but Sydney seem to be a head of everyone when it comes to developing players and picking talent. Are we going to look back at this draft and say we missed the boat or are we doing the right thing?
This draft dies after 20 if i am led to believe

Next years is supposed to be very strong though
 
Walker made it clear that he thought his best football was to be up forward and after being open to being traded in 2010 produced 50 goals in 2011.
Sort of proves enough to me.

This year didn't start off too well for Walker having been injured and just didn't fare too well for anyone else thereafter.

I know.
People complained about our lack of forwardline structure all year, but more so than missing Waite, Hammer and other key forwards, it was the lack of Walker through injury or needing to be moved up the ground that killed us.
But he slaughtered Milne in the last game, and but for a terrible umpiring non-decision late in the game, would have been the first defender to ever hold him goalless at Etihad.

Just wish we had 2 of him.
 
So we look like we are only use 3 pick (11, 36, 56 and not use 71 or 76) and upgrade 3 rookies and we finished 10th But Sydney won the flag and are having 8 picks with the last 3 being 103, 121 and 139. there first 5 picks are between 20 and 70. I'm not saying that what we are doing is wrong or we should cut player A, B or C but Sydney seem to be a head of everyone when it comes to developing players and picking talent. Are we going to look back at this draft and say we missed the boat or are we doing the right thing?
If pinching players from other clubs like Mumford, Kennedy, Shaw, Mattner, Richards, McGlynn, Seaby, Armstrong, Morton, after they have been nurtured by those clubs first, equals being ahead when developing players, then I think the definition of developing players has changed. Yes some of these players were only fringe players at other clubs, but a number of them have come from clubs who have been very successful over the last 5-6 years & therefore have very good systems in place for players to come into when they are first drafted.

The real proof of their development ability would be demonstrated by then having a period of domination like the Cats & also having the same TPPs as the other AFL clubs, excluding GWS & the Suns. Yes the Swans have done well to win a couple of premierships over the last 8 seasons, but when comparing them to the rest of the AFL clubs, it is like comparing apples with Chinese gooseberries.
 
Why are people using Sydney as an example of kids developing well? They have had a hard core of premiership veterans around the club for years. Wish we were so lucky, but it's been Judd, and to a lesser extent Scotland
 

Remove this Banner Ad

He may but not his call. SR is número UNO now.
Remember speed is king...will this be the mantra for propelling our choices?
He meant Western Bulldogs, not Wayne Hughes. Absolutely every chance that they might pass on him. Macrae, Garlett, Stringer, Jaksch and Vlastuin are ones that will throw some mock drafts off the scent.
 
We can sort of hope Tippett enters the draft and gets taken by Brisbane at pick 8.
If Tippett gets past Brisbane, he's too talented for Hardwick who loves his list cloggers and role players.

GC or GWS after a nudge and a wink from Demetriou, Ken Wood and the AFL Commission.
 
If Tippett gets past Brisbane, he's too talented for Hardwick who loves his list cloggers and role players.

GC or GWS after a nudge and a wink from Demetriou, Ken Wood and the AFL Commission.
Tigers probably couldn't afford him. Chaplin in, Cotchin, Deledio, Riewoldt on good money and Martin soon to command more.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I want Stringer.
Any chance WB would pass on him?

I think either WB take him or they'll take Plowman, probably will be one or the other.
But think Vlaustin/Lonergan/Jakcsh would be a realistic chance to fall to your pick & play an important role in the futre.
 
Tigers probably couldn't afford him. Chaplin in, Cotchin, Deledio, Riewoldt on good money and Martin soon to command more.
Their salary cap couldn't possibly be that big. They're a young side and they haven't played finals. Questions should be asked if they can't fit in Tippett.

After what the Tippetts go up to, the AFL should force Tippett into the draft with no stipulations regarding his contract. The AFL could deregister him for six to 12 weeks, but he'll still get off relatively scott free if signs for big money. A club would welcome a fresh power KPF for the finals or a push at the finals.
 
Their salary cap couldn't possibly be that big. They're a young side and they haven't played finals. Questions should be asked if they can't fit in Tippett.

After what the Tippetts go up to, the AFL should force Tippett into the draft with no stipulations regarding his contract. The AFL could deregister him for six to 12 weeks, but he'll still get off relatively scott free if signs for big money. A club would welcome a fresh power KPF for the finals or a push at the finals.

They couldn't fit Cloke in (without having to make some changes) ... so one would assume they can't fit Kurt in.
 
Tippet getting picked before us could be a great result
 
Their salary cap couldn't possibly be that big. They're a young side and they haven't played finals. Questions should be asked if they can't fit in Tippett.

After what the Tippetts go up to, the AFL should force Tippett into the draft with no stipulations regarding his contract. The AFL could deregister him for six to 12 weeks, but he'll still get off relatively scott free if signs for big money. A club would welcome a fresh power KPF for the finals or a push at the finals.
Exactly, he's foregone his right to be demanding anything.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top