money and i bought one this year and didnt use it once when i went to tiger gamesWhat's stopping you from getting a membership now?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
money and i bought one this year and didnt use it once when i went to tiger gamesWhat's stopping you from getting a membership now?
Ok question for everyone who would you take at our picks. Lets presume Grundy is gone before our pick.
Rank from 1 to 3: 1st round Vlastuin, Garner or Macrae (add him in as it sounds he could last)?
Rank from 1 to 15: 2nd rounders?
Rory Atkins
Jason Pongracic
Tim Broomhead
Marvin Warrell
Tim Sumner
Harrison Marsh
Matthew Dick
Adam Carter
Andrew Boston
Nick Graham
Shane Nelson
Dean Kent
Tom Temay
Sam Lowrie
Nathan Wright
He's got some exciting qualities with his speed, leap, strong mark. Needs to develop consistency but at 43 may be worth it. Could last till the rookie draft for all I know. Had a game in under 18's where he kicked 8 this year.Don't see the fuss about Sumner. Admittedly I only saw the national champs games, but he was next to useless.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Ranking them myself I'd go
1st Round: Garner, Vlastuin, Macrae.
2nd Round: Atkins, Pongracic, Broomhead, Carter, Warrell, Marsh.
Should add all can kick to a high level. Pongracic probably the weakest in this area but his ball-winning and role counteracts that IMO and he is still a good kick.
They can all win their own footy. Warrell probably the weakest at this but his skills are elite, has a good defensive game and can at least win some of his own ball and as a small forward you don't have to be a gun in this area.
From what I've heard/read they are all high character guys. Not sure on Warrell. Anyone else got info on how he interviewed?
Meanwhile others are putting their hard earned in to help get the club to where you want them to be before you spend a dime. Nice one!I am waiting to be fully convinced the number on goal of the club is to build a successful premiership team. I am going to such lengths because I have been waiting so long for success I am deliberately fighting a protest fight to help ensure Tigers are a little leaner to perform to do the absolute best to put itself in a position for on field and off field success(plus I live outside Victoria) . The rationale is a little tough love makes you stronger and all including the power brokers are answerable to the supporters which should never be forgotten.
So for me the bar is not about making finals necessarily but making decisions and bringing in the best plausible players to the team list which meet the objective of getting us the best team possible on the paddock for RFC at the optimum time(our premiership window) for us to win a premiership. This can be more easily scrutinised and effective as the cattle argument is the number one ingredient for premiership success IMO.
If I am 100% confident the selection criteria is impeccable or close to I will rest easy and get a membership because half the battle will be won. So while my confidence in the Tigers has improved I am not 100% confident. And if they pass on Grundy it will fall away again![]()
Imagine how the club would be placed if the majority of members had this mindset....Meanwhile others are putting their hard earned in to help get the club to where you want them to be before you spend a dime. Nice one!
Wow really. Didnt see that coming. Thought it was agreed he was going around againBrogan delisted.
Tippett surely in line.
Still can't fathom why GWS wouldn't nab Grundy
I understand everyone can't afford a membership yet want to support the Tigers in spirit. What I don't get is people who can afford a basic membership at least, withholding until we are basically in the 8. Without financial support from members they aren't just going to magic - no pun intended - money from no where in order to get there. Being in the 8 or even a GF we as members can say we are part of that and I'm happy to share that with all Tiger supporters however deliberate withholders are parasites in my book.Imagine how the club would be placed if the majority of members had this mindset....
Brogan delisted.
Tippett surely in line.
Still can't fathom why GWS wouldn't nab Grundy
For all my bitching about how the club is run - we'd pretty much have to merge or re-locate for me to stop supporting it.
That's a nice opinion.Are you saying Selwood got the cats into the Finals in 2007?
Pretty confident they would have made it without him mate.
As much as I like Grundy, I'm willing to back in what our recruiters have been doing with our first rounders. Riewoldt, Cotchin, Rance (priority end of round), Vickery, Martin, Conca, Ellis. No busts in there which is a thumbs up from me. Mix of stars and good core footballers.
Garner or Macrae for you?
I must say in some pretty bloody bleak years over the last 30 I have occasionally delayed joining up until the last week in my little protest.Well said.
If someone thinks something is wrong at the club, apply for a job there or run for the board - make the change happen. Refusing to buy a membership is a silent protest because no one knows its happening, and it changes nothing other than depriving the club of funds.
That's a nice opinion.
So please tell me then, what factors, more specifically, do you think contributed to their massive improvement in one season with 8 more wins, and a premiership? (The went 16-2 with him, and 2-2 without him). They had no important additions or subtractions from the list. They had a massive increase in percentage also. Selwood contributed in his debut season almost 20 possessions, 5 marks and 5 tackles a game, while playing significant time as a ball extractor in the midfield, copping plenty of physical attention (as shown by the 36 frees he recieved for the year). He was a major reason for Gary Ablett's break-out season, where he had such a significant increase in output, averaging more than 10 disposals a match while still being able to have a similar impact on the scoreboard.
I believe his work in the midfield released all their midfielders from copping the attention they were getting in 2006, and was a huge reason for the improved seasons from Bartel and Corey. Selwood's importance to the Geelong structure is often understated, and had arguably the greatest first year of any player in the AFL, which was a lot due to the players already in the team.
Well said.
If someone thinks something is wrong at the club, apply for a job there or run for the board - make the change happen. Refusing to buy a membership is a silent protest because no one knows its happening, and it changes nothing other than depriving the club of funds.
I understand everyone can't afford a membership yet want to support the Tigers in spirit. What I don't get is people who can afford a basic membership at least, withholding until we are basically in the 8. Without financial support from members they aren't just going to magic - no pun intended - money from no where in order to get there. Being in the 8 or even a GF we as members can say we are part of that and I'm happy to share that with all Tiger supporters however deliberate withholders are parasites in my book.
That's a nice opinion.
So please tell me then, what factors, more specifically, do you think contributed to their massive improvement in one season with 8 more wins, and a premiership? (The went 16-2 with him, and 2-2 without him). They had no important additions or subtractions from the list. They had a massive increase in percentage also. Selwood contributed in his debut season almost 20 possessions, 5 marks and 5 tackles a game, while playing significant time as a ball extractor in the midfield, copping plenty of physical attention (as shown by the 36 frees he recieved for the year). He was a major reason for Gary Ablett's break-out season, where he had such a significant increase in output, averaging more than 10 disposals a match while still being able to have a similar impact on the scoreboard.
I believe his work in the midfield released all their midfielders from copping the attention they were getting in 2006, and was a huge reason for the improved seasons from Bartel and Corey. Selwood's importance to the Geelong structure is often understated, and had arguably the greatest first year of any player in the AFL, which was a lot due to the players already in the team.
Haha calm ya farm mate
So you still haven't answered my question? What specific factors were responsible to such a massive improvement in one season? The only thing I think you are alluding to is the natural improvement of the whole team? I agree is a given, but every club has this but doesn't lead to 8 more wins in a season and a premiership. The fact is their first round draft pick came straight into their team and helped form the Cats major strength for the next two premierships, their midfield. That isn't my opinion but at the time a view shared by most people in football.Almost your entire post is based on your opinion, doesnt make it right, nor does it make me wrong.
The fact 22 players make a team, and by your own admission, several players improved, I think it is ridiculous to link all this, plus team success to one 18 year old draftee playing in what turned out be a gun side.
I am afraid you lost me at " he was a major reason for Gary Abletts break out season". Is this the same Gary Ablett who has since gone to another level with lesser quality around him? I think you will find Gaz is the main reason Gaz had a break out season and has continued to do so, inspired by his team mates reaming him in an open forum.
Was Selwood a contributor? Well yes I agree. was every player on their list who played senior footy a contributor. Well one would also have to say yes. Was any one individual responsible? Hell to the no friend!
So let me confirm, if I may, Selwood propelled the Cats into the finals in 2007 in your opinion?
06 they definitely under performed, but this was later shown to be largely due to work ethic of the players at the time. Joel set a new standard in training and fearless attack on the field which many players embraced.No one is doubting Selwood was a great pick up but i think there was more to it then that. Don't forget 04 they just lost a prelim to Brisbane and in 05 they almost beat the premiers sydney in sydney except for about 5 seconds and nick davis magic. 06 was an aberration.
Do not think that will affect our pick. These two have been invited as I assume the Club believes Grundy will not be there at 9, and those two are the back-up plan?Just had a read of Knightmares recent post about Grundy (very interesting) seems to believe that GWS wont be selecting Grundy due to an Agreement reached with Giles to sign on as #1 ruckman for the next few years and not to draft another gun Ruck ??
But I am also starting to believe that even if Grundy was still available at #9 - we wont select him and pass and will take a midfielder,My reasoning for this is mainly because of the invites that have been handed to both Stephenson & Wood, To me it looks like the club just wants a backup incase Maric goes down and not looking for a long term ruckman in the draft.
Plus some of the recent trading has also led me to believe that Hardwick & co have decided that we need to be top 8 next year and wont continue with the 100% development line and will scale back to just the draft picks and get developed players with the later/Rookie selection - in other words draft for now