Those people that get impressed by someone predicting the rough order of the draft, I ask you this question.
What is more impressive.
2009 Draft:
So while one got the order correct, the second person potentially picked the better players.
I like a phantom drafter that goes against the grain a little and attempts to back in their concepts. No doubt they will be wrong more often than the professionals, but that is half the fun.
What is more impressive.
2009 Draft:
- Scully
- Trengove
- Martin
- Morabito
- Cunnington
- Rohan
- Sheppard
- Butcher
- Moore
- Melksham
- Gysberts
- Lucas
- Talia
- Jetta
- Howard
- Fyfe
- Martin
- Carlisle
- Cunnington
- Talia
- Duncan
- Gunstan
- Jetta
- Christensen
- Scully
- Trengove
- Reid
- Vardy
- Lucas
- Pittard
So while one got the order correct, the second person potentially picked the better players.
I like a phantom drafter that goes against the grain a little and attempts to back in their concepts. No doubt they will be wrong more often than the professionals, but that is half the fun.

