List Mgmt. 2013 DRAFT

[Silvagnis]

I believe Brisbane people where in perth yesterday speaking to Dom Sheed.
So he maybe your first pick.

GWS Boyd
GWS Kelly
St.K Billings
WBD Aish
GCS Kolodashnij
Coll Scharenberg
Bris Sheed
Kang
Melb Lennon
Coll Salem
WCE Acres
Rich Dunstan
Carl Freeman/Dumont

 

[HBF]

Is 13 too high for Hartung?

 

[C4[2]Yo`DooR]

Is 13 too high for Hartung?

IMO .. yes.

Although, I don't want Dumont either at Pick #13

 

[Sublime]

GWS Boyd
GWS Kelly
St.K Billings
WBD Aish
GCS Kolodashnij
Coll Scharenberg
Bris Sheed
Kang
Melb Lennon
Coll Salem
WCE Acres
Rich Dunstan
Carl Freeman/Dumont

Would Bontempelli interest us in this scenario?

 

[C4[2]Yo`DooR]

Would Bontempelli interest us in this scenario?

I'm pretty torn on Bontempelli.

 

[etsal1]

Would Bontempelli interest us in this scenario?

He's looking like a potential slider. Everything depends on McCarthy going top 10. If this happens we should get a very nice slider.

 

[C4[2]Yo`DooR]

What are peoples thoughts on Lewis Taylor?

I know he's a bit undersized, but he has some nice pace and good disposal.

 

[Azul]

Who is Kang?

 

[C4[2]Yo`DooR]

He's looking like a potential slider. Everything depends on McCarthy going top 10. If this happens we should get a very nice slider.

So the way we can look at is that we will either end up with McCarthy or/ a nice slider at Pick #13.

 

[C4[2]Yo`DooR]

Who is Kang?

It was a typo ... he meant Krang.

 

[etsal1]

From what I've read the last couple of days I can see it going something like:

1. Boyd
2. Kelly
3. Billings
4. Aish
5. Kol
6. Scharenberg
7. McCarthy
8. McDonald
9. Freeman
10. Salem
11. Sheed
12. Lennon
13. Bontempelli/Dunstan/Acres/Taylor

And if let's say Botempelli goes before our pick, that means someone else that I named will drop. It just all depends on McCarthy going top 10 (preferably to Brisbane at 7).

 

[etsal1]

So the way we can look at is that we will either end up with McCarthy or/ a nice slider at Pick #13.

Even if McCarthy doesn't go before our pick, if we want a midfielder we will take midfielder. McCarthy going before our pick just means we should get someone who was touted as top 10. There'll still be good mids even if he doesn't go. I know he's not the most trustworthy but Brett Anderson thinks we're pretty keen on Dunstan and Quayle thinks we like Freeman if he's there.

 

[Silvagnis]

From what I've read

We're all waiting for the next source to influence our thinking...

 

[Omega Blue]

I'm pretty torn on Bontempelli.

how so, I haven't considered him because I largely assumed he would be gone before our pick

 

[The Old Dark Navy's]

I like the look of McCarthy and it is time we started drafting some talls earlier in the draft, but with him being a mad Freo fan and WA boy I can't help but feel that with so many decent mids around our pick, we'd be better off picking up a Victorian lad and taking away the go home factor.

 

[The Old Dark Navy's]

We're all waiting for the next source to influence our thinking...

Or we'll speculate and discuss in a manner befitting a discussion forum and get a definite answer in 7 days time. I hope we can hold on.

 

[Omega Blue]

I like the look of McCarthy and it is time we started drafting some talls earlier in the draft, but with him being a mad Freo fan and WA boy I can't help but feel that with so many decent mids around our pick, we'd be better off picking up a Victorian lad and taking away the go home factor.

unfortunately its a risk we have to consider.... its why I see WCE taking only either Sheed or Acres.

 

[Silvagnis]

Or we'll speculate and discuss in a manner befitting a discussion forum and get a definite answer in 7 days time. I hope we can hold on.

My comment also refers to the person who posted Royal Eagle's rumour.

Unless we're a draft watcher and connected, we're all just speculating.

 

[Omega Blue]

My comment also refers to the person who posted Royal Eagle's rumour.

Unless we're a draft watcher and connected, we're all just speculating.

isn't that the fun of it all though?
to come up with different permutations on how it will all turn out, then you factor in variables like needs, best available and rumoured leaks which all either increase or decrease the probability of certain things happening.
I love this draft period with so many players around the same still level it really has everyone guessing.

rumours like Richmond wanting Jones and Lions being linked to Sheed or McCarthy which inturn screws with WCE potential pick, that's what makes it enjoyable

 

[The Old Dark Navy's]

Unless we're a draft watcher and connected, we're all just speculating.

Even draft watchers are speculating. They just have more of an idea of whereabouts in the draft a player will go. I have no problem with people posting info from a variety of sources. I also have no problem with posters believing or disbelieving those sources. There will be definitive end to this speculation next Thursday and the speculation doesn't hurt the club. It does make people ponder, postulate, hypothesise and encourage others to do the same as a result. Win/Win.

 

[Sheephead]

From what I've read the last couple of days I can see it going something like:

1. Boyd
2. Kelly
3. Billings
4. Aish
5. Kol
6. Scharenberg
7. McCarthy
8. McDonald
9. Freeman
10. Salem
11. Sheed
12. Lennon
13. Bontempelli/Dunstan/Acres/Taylor

And if let's say Botempelli goes before our pick, that means someone else that I named will drop. It just all depends on McCarthy going top 10 (preferably to Brisbane at 7).

I like this the most. Heck, we get 4 players with our pick. Coooooooooollll!!!





....seriously, if thats our choices, and you havent included Couch in their either, then I'll go;

Bontempelli
Acres
Couch
Taylor
Dunstan

 

[BM123]

What are peoples thoughts on Lewis Taylor?

I know he's a bit undersized, but he has some nice pace and good disposal.

Too small for our current midfield. Rather get one of Dunstan, Acres, Freeman and Lennon.

 

[Sheephead]

Why don't we just drop another letter and call him Ouch?

Dunstan or Bontempelli would be nice.................and if we select one of the others then that will be nice also.

I did it again. Crouch FFS, stoopid sheep. Maybe i hope he turns out like the Geelong variety.

 

[zeeCFC]

Why don't we just drop another letter and call him Ouch?

Because he doesn't actually hurt the opposition with his disposal



... Crouch wouldn't be a bad pick up though!

 

[C4[2]Yo`DooR]

how so, I haven't considered him because I largely assumed he would be gone before our pick

He's an awkward height (192 cms), he isn't overly quick and he's pretty soft.


.... aside from that all that though, he seems ok.

A few pre-seasons may change all of that though - and he could become a monster on-baller though which is kind of tempting.