Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
“Our Victorian members need to be aware the Club requested six games in Melbourne, however, with the introduction of Gold Coast and GWS, as well as the commercial deals of a number of Melbourne clubs to host games interstate - in our case, Melbourne (Darwin - Rd 17) and Hawthorn (Launceston - Rd 14) - the AFL was unable to accommodate this request in this year’s fixture,” Holmes said.
“We’re obviously disappointed with this outcome but understand the changing landscape the AFL now operates under.
“We will continue to lobby the AFL for six games in Melbourne in future years.”
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Holy shit, the Club's response looks like it could have been written by Adrian Anderson or one of the other goons from the Kremlin.
It shows how much of an aparutus of the AFL we have become. Holmes obviously has little idea about what he is dealing with.
It has made me even more angry. Just parroting lines from the AFL is a complete disgrace. It is the obvious problem when you get in a CEO that has no idea about the passions and heritage behind football clubs.
Basically his comments could almost be seen as endorsing the future breaking of the merger agreement - BECAUSE THINGS HAVE CHANGED.
So one commercial agreement that was induced, facilitated and approved by the AFL - i.e. the merger agreement between Fitzroy and Brisbane gets completely ignorned and thrown away in favour of commercial agreements between Melbourne clubs and interstate venues that were made 16 years down the track???????????????
Holy shit, the Club's response looks like it could have been written by Adrian Anderson or one of the other goons from the Kremlin.
It shows how much of an aparutus of the AFL we have become. Holmes obviously has little idea about what he is dealing with.
It has made me even more angry. Just parroting lines from the AFL is a complete disgrace. It is the obvious problem when you get in a CEO that has no idea about the passions and heritage behind football clubs.
Basically his comments could almost be seen as endorsing the future breaking of the merger agreement - BECAUSE THINGS HAVE CHANGED.
So one commercial agreement that was induced, facilitated and approved by the AFL - i.e. the merger agreement between Fitzroy and Brisbane gets completely ignorned and thrown away in favour of commercial agreements between Melbourne clubs and interstate venues that were made 16 years down the track???????????????
What are the club's options?
All clubs have their hands tied by the draw. The club gets to put in their claims, and obviously they did, but the AFL is the final arbiter. I can understand people getting pissed off at the AFL, but unless you're wanting the club to launch legal action or some such (and any realist could point out the likelihood of this), I don't see what the club could do more than what they have done.
- Accept it without question. Go over like a lead balloon, and not the hard rocking type.
- Put out a press release reiterating the club's position and pointing the finger at the AFL. What they did.
- Legal action against the AFL over the draw? What other options do they have?
Edit: The thing that pisses me off about the Victorian games is that we play seven Victorian clubs but two of the games are off in Shitsville. How hard would it have been to swap one or two other clubs into an Aurora and/or Darwin slot?
At the other end of the scale, the easiest draw in terms of opponents' win-loss record belongs to the Brisbane Lions, whose 2013 opponents this year won 47.2 per cent of their matches. It helps, in the case of the Lions, that they get two games against Gold Coast, which won just three games in 2012.
Honestly, in heart of hearts, do you really think that's an option for the club?
I reckon Bill Atherton from the Fitzroy Football Club in Melbourne, might be thinking about that right now.
How do we know, under the "AFL changing landscape" crap, that we will only get 4 Victorian games in 2014 ???
I'm not arguing that it's not a problem. I just think the expectation that the club should challenge this legally is just unrealistic.
What are the club's options?
All clubs have their hands tied by the draw. The club gets to put in their claims, and obviously they did, but the AFL is the final arbiter. I can understand people getting pissed off at the AFL, but unless you're wanting the club to launch legal action or some such (and any realist could point out the likelihood of this), I don't see what the club could do more than what they have done.
- Accept it without question. Go over like a lead balloon, and not the hard rocking type.
- Put out a press release reiterating the club's position and pointing the finger at the AFL. What they did.
- Legal action against the AFL over the draw? What other options do they have?