Hmm, interesting, not sure I like the sound of that. Worringly reminicient of past drafting strategies under previous coaches in the desperate dying years of their tenures.
gws trades i think he meant.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Hmm, interesting, not sure I like the sound of that. Worringly reminicient of past drafting strategies under previous coaches in the desperate dying years of their tenures.
gws trades i think he meant.
Interested to see how his year pans out and where he goes on draft day.Log in to remove this Banner Ad
So many later picks talents that could make us better. We need those types. Desperately. I'd be upset we don't recruit one.
This is what worries me when I hear shit like apparently we don't rate the draft. It's 2nd of June FFS. It seems very close minded and the Champs just started so some players will break out over the next month. Not all those blokes I listed above will make it but you need to give them a chance. If we could get 1 or 2 of them even. We'll likely bow out in the 3rd round and not try a late pick.
Dont believe everything you hear especially in the context of which it was delivered.
Traded next pick for a 29yo VFL player then picked up cast offs because te quality wasn't there in the rookie draft. That was the reason for the change in philosophy according to FJ on TAC Future Stars just then.I know I know. Same was said last year and we bowed out after pick 43.Traded next pick for a 29yo VFL player then picked up cast offs because te quality wasn't there in the rookie draft. That was the reason for the change in philosophy according to FJ on TAC Future Stars just then.
Have we seen any evidence to the contrary yet though tigs? I would say not.
You referring to quality in the rookie draft?
Kyle Martin was one I was super keen on last year and he kicked 2 goals and looked like he had an eternity at AFL level. Will be very good player.
Dwyer looks the goods in his early games.
Callum Sinclair has shown a bit for West Coast.
Jack Frost looks decent as a KPD as well.
For the 18 year olds it's too early in their development to tell. Some will be duds and some will produce the goods. We've given ourselves 1 chance to get a long term player IMO.
Yeah was referring to the rookie draft. I'll give you Martin and Dwyer, definitely missed the boat with those guys. And yeah it's probably too early to tell with the kids. But I think our policy was sound at the time and has provided some dividends so far. The only issue is that we seem to be playing these retreads in preference to our kids, in detriment to their development. I reckon it's more how we're using those guys that's the problem, rather than the fact we got them in the first place. If that makes sense?
Yep, that's been my issue with them. I think we went one too many but it's more been them getting games over young guys.
I know I know. Same was said last year and we bowed out after pick 43.Traded next pick for a 29yo VFL player then picked up cast offs because te quality wasn't there in the rookie draft. That was the reason for the change in philosophy according to FJ on TAC Future Stars just then.
I would have preferred we taken the Pies approach and taken the best VFL prospects like Martin, Dwyer etc. to have that ready made depth. I was a massive fan of Martin prior to the draft. Tell me he wouldn't have done a better job at half back than Petterd.
He'll show a good a pick up he is in the next few weeks that's for sure.
You referring to quality in the rookie draft?
Kyle Martin was one I was super keen on last year and he kicked 2 goals and looked like he had an eternity at AFL level. Will be very good player.
Dwyer looks the goods in his early games.
Callum Sinclair has shown a bit for West Coast.
Jack Frost looks decent as a KPD as well.
For the 18 year olds it's too early in their development to tell. Some will be duds and some will produce the goods. We've given ourselves 1 chance to get a long term player IMO.
Yeah was referring to the rookie draft. I'll give you Martin and Dwyer, definitely missed the boat with those guys. And yeah it's probably too early to tell with the kids. But I think our policy was sound at the time and has provided some dividends so far. The only issue is that we seem to be playing these retreads in preference to our kids, in detriment to their development. I reckon it's more how we're using those guys that's the problem, rather than the fact we got them in the first place. If that makes sense?
Yep on a 1 year deal. I saw this and it was interesting that we didnt like the quality for the rookie draft.
Imo martin do ok but i dont see him being a 'very good player'. I think you need to give it a few games before claiming that accolade.
It depends on where they were taken and if they were available too.
Yer was a bizarre comment. I can understand kids wise but not a young state leaguer.
They were my thoughts when he was playing VFL last year that he'd make a very good level AFL player. Kicked 6 from 30 touches last week. His AFL debut didn't do anything to change my opinion. We didn't really need a back flanker IMO so Petterd was kind of pointless. Lonergan pick I was ok with as he's a midfielder and the Coburg side shows we need more of them. I just feel like a goal kicking midfielder would have been a good get. I don't think we spend enough time watching state leagues.
Martin went after Petterd. Pick 13 I think.
Averaging 21 possesionsReally hope Wilson slips through to our second round pick, if not we need to draft an outside mid and a small forward, not too sure who there is though. Chris Cain would also be a good get. I highly doubt Richmond will go after Garlett.
He's certainly a gun but for 'cultural' reasons I doubt he'll come, plus he's an awkward selection, if you pass on him in the first round get taken before second.Averaging 21 possesions
7 marks
2.5 goals this year against men in the wafl as a 18yo kid
Certainly would be a massive upgrade on Nahas
Not really , He is exactly the type of player we needHe's certainly a gun but for 'cultural' reasons I doubt he'll come, plus he's an awkward selection, if you pass on him in the first round get taken before second.
Not really , He is exactly the type of player we need
Downgrade our 1st or upgrade our 2nd picks