Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Unless Morris gets injured , I really cant see a spot in the Richmond best 25 - 30 players for Matt Thomas TBH
Just seems like a backup for our backup, Would much rather use that spot for a speedy small skilled foward which is a need
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I think it's as a one year rookie. Can clear him out in a strong draft next year.
Would rather get a look at either a kid or a 'Need' Player -
Me too but if they don't like anything they may as well take a guy for a year to contribute now.
You could argue that we 'need' a big bodied inside mid to replace Tuck and help protect our younger mids.Would rather get a look at either a kid or a 'Need' Player -
Unless Morris gets injured , I really cant see a spot in the Richmond best 25 - 30 players for Matt Thomas TBH
Just seems like a backup for our backup, Would much rather use that spot for a speedy small skilled foward which is a need
Little point getting one if the quality isn't there. Thomas on the other hand is a known player who like Lonergan, would be instant cover for one of our experienced players going down and would also provide some experience for the VFL side to show the kids the way they need to go about it as a professional player.
You could argue that we 'need' a big bodied inside mid to replace Tuck and help protect our younger mids.
Sent from my GT-N5110 using Tapatalk
You see this is where i struggle with opinions like this RT with No dis respect intended so please dont take it the wrong way
Eddie Betts , Stephen Milne are good examples where they were seen as quality not being there and after a couple of years and Development in the right envoirment become the best small fowards in the League
we also did this with McDonough and is looking very good so far , But with Thomas he is a known Player thats 26 years old and deemed not good enough for a club who i believe are behind us in both quality and development
I fail to see who Thomas is instant cover for to be honest Dea,Darrou,Batchelor are all about the same if not questinably better level in defence and We have Arnot,Helbig Williams plus who we will bring in with #12 and maybe #50 in the midfield
Thomas will help us with our VFL team but thats about all,Better off getting a speculative small foward that may end up showing something for the future
Realistically Richmonds window will open 2015 and we should be planing these selections for 2015-2018
When I mention the quality not being there, I'm not saying we shouldn't take a small forward, more that we shouldn't go taking one just because we need one and they are available. To put it another way, if we're down to our last pick in the rookie draft and the choice was the known quality that is Thomas and a speculative small forward who need a heap of time and development put into them, then I'd much prefer the club to take Thomas. Being the 44th player on the list he isn't exactly costing anyone an opportunity as we've taken everyone else that we rate higher than him and the speculative kid.
As I said above Thomas would be a Lonergan type rookie addition, might only be here for 1 season, but in the unlikely event that we do need to turn to the last guy on the list to fill in for a few games in the AFL he isn't going to be found wanting.
Bootsma, Watson, Lucas and Yarran are their first round draft picks from 2008-2011. I just hope they don't ruin another young talent in Menzel. Their record of hits in the first round is appalling. The only ones who have come on are their first round picks and its impossible to stuff those up unless you're Melbourne.I just hope that Carltank's pick doesn't turn out better than ours.
But the I remember their recruiters are sillys
Difference is Mcdonough was a pick in the national draft, where as I'm talking about taking Thomas as our final rookie pick only if he is considered to be better than the other optionsYou see this is what troubles me RT - You want to recuit a player that is just a stop gap for 1 year that as you said is a known quality which has shown he doesnt offer enough at AFL level.
The speculative pick kid might just be the next Betts/Milne or even a Foley type kid that can come through to establish himself
McDonough is the exact type we should be looking for at these selections
We dont need average backup players we need to always go for quality that will improve our list with youth unless its a glaring deficiency on our list that needs adressing
anybody got any info on who we might be looking at for our second pick?
Difference is Mcdonough was a pick in the national draft, where as I'm talking about taking Thomas as our final rookie pick only if he is considered to be better than the other options
Bootsma, Watson, Lucas and Yarran are their first round draft picks from 2008-2011. I just hope they don't ruin another young talent in Menzel. Their record of hits in the first round is appalling. The only ones who have come on are their first round picks and its impossible to stuff those up unless you're Melbourne.
You see this is what troubles me RT - You want to recuit a player that is just a stop gap for 1 year that as you said is a known quality which has shown he doesnt offer enough at AFL level.
The speculative pick kid might just be the next Betts/Milne or even a Foley type kid that can come through to establish himself
McDonough is the exact type we should be looking for at these selections
We dont need average backup players we need to always go for quality that will improve our list with youth unless its a glaring deficiency on our list that needs adressing
But my point is that is the type we should be looking at and doesnt matter the last pick of the rookie draft - We dont need Thomas
He adds nothing to our list
But my point is that is the type we should be looking at and doesnt matter the last pick of the rookie draft - We dont need Thomas
He adds nothing to our list