- Mar 24, 2012
- 2,308
- 1,372
- AFL Club
- Gold Coast
- Other Teams
- Arsenal, Arizona Cardinals
Jack for great consistency and loads of tackling +4's, Kennedy for cheaper and much higher ceiling. Does attract the tag though. I'm biased, but I'd pick Jack.
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
2013 Player X v Player Y
- Thread starter FlowersByIrene
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Status
JDWCE
Norm Smith Medallist
I would go Jack as well. Kennedy attracts the tag too often for my liking and today scored 112 from 37 possessions. I would want a much bigger return from that many possessions
S selwood or Stanton?
Bye dependent
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Both inconsistent, Scooter depends on how hard he is tagging, Stanton depends on if he gets tagged. Stanton should average more for the year.
It's tough. Out of best av per round I can get. Stanton, Cornes, Barlow, S Selwood, Griffen, Montagna, Masten and Swallow. A lot of questions on all of them. I'm actually leaning towards ball
The bold are the most proven consistent scorers. Would go with one of those three.
jbiddy89
Senior List
Midfielder conundrum for a cover spot in my elite midfield.
Take a punt on Mitchell;
Pick up Ziebell even though he is out until R14 (finals are R15/16); or
Grab someone like Daniel Jackson who is playing well and is getting games but not really that high a DTer.
Take a punt on Mitchell;
Pick up Ziebell even though he is out until R14 (finals are R15/16); or
Grab someone like Daniel Jackson who is playing well and is getting games but not really that high a DTer.
glasto2010
Debutant
- Feb 24, 2013
- 102
- 109
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Brett Goodes or Jed Adcock for DT Elite?
lmach
Naitanui2Yeo
Adcock, higher ceiling.
lmach
Naitanui2Yeo
I have two decisions to make:
Bartel v N.Riewoldt (same bye, similar price)
and
Jack (521k) v Swallow (461k) v Masten (504k) (all same bye)
Bartel v N.Riewoldt (same bye, similar price)
and
Jack (521k) v Swallow (461k) v Masten (504k) (all same bye)
I think Swallow at his price represents value but Masten keeps scoring this year and would be very unique if your game.
Gibbs v Heppell
Had planned on getting both in next 2 weeks but Now Vlastuin is playing well this is my last back upgrade in the near future as Vlaustuin will hold his own as B6 while I get my mids.
lmach
Naitanui2Yeo
I'm actually leaning towards Jack now because of his consistency (only 1 score under 99) compared to Swallow's inconsistency. I've decided to avoid Masten for now as I don't like the thought of having three Eagles in my mids (Scooter and Priddis).
Thoughts on Bartel v Riewoldt? Same bye's and Bartel has a pretty good draw coming up.
I would go Gibbs over Heppell at the moment, purely based on priced, couldn't split them otherwise.
Fair call on 3eagles mids although it doesn't always matter.
Yeah Gibbs price appealing.
I like NRoo. He works so hard every game. If saints don't completely suck he will get a lot of marks.
JDWCE
Norm Smith Medallist
N Roo for sure. No question marks for me. Bartel has question marks on his role occasionally and may be rested. Saints cant afford to rest Roo
Swallow easy.
Riewoldt will be cheaper in a few weeks so if your going one now go bartel.
Start Hutchings or Crouch?
Damn would be great to have this problem. Both sub risks... probably Hutchings because he should get 80+ and Crouch is more likely to be the sub. Then again Crouch has had 2 fully fit games in the SANFL so I don't know if the sub is necessary.
Thanks mate.
Yep just traded Hutchings in though to free up more cash for the long run. Still only have 18 playing with no other emg. I'm leaning towards Hutchings only because he has played well the last 3 games.
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
lmach
Naitanui2Yeo
Why Swallow easy? Because of his price? Jack really appeals to me, regardless of his price. He's ultra consistent. Swallow doesn't really tonne up much, only 9 times last year (Jack already has 8 times this year). At this point, I'm not worrying about the price, I want to get who I think will be the best scorer for the rest of the year. So do you think Swallow will score better than Jack?
Hmm, yeah I think I may go Bartel and hope Mackenzie can hold Riewoldt this week like he has done to every other forward he's matched up on. Then I can pick him up for about 450k in a couple of weeks. Plus Bartel has GWS this week.
JDWCE
Norm Smith Medallist
word that Hutchings didnt board the plane so that may change your plans
Waaaaat. Ohh well to late now. Got crouch as emg
Waaaaat. Ohh well to late now. Got crouch as emg
For me swallow has by far the best value of the above mentioned. I don't really rate Jack any better as a scorer and swallow comes 60k cheaper.
lmach
Naitanui2Yeo
Ended up going Jack as a bit of a unique. I can't see Swallow scoring 100's consistently, too many 80's for mine. He's also the first to get tagged for North, whereas Jack is behind guys like JPK, Hanneberry and possibly O'Keefe. Plus I feel I need to go unique to climb the rankings.
I actually didn't even realise how unique Jack is. More people own players like Jetta, Motlop and H.Taylor than Jack.
- Status