Position 2013 SC Defenders

[rocker_oz33]

Goddard, Hartlett, Shaw, Gibbs, Ibbotson, Goodes (Pittard, Clisby)

So one spot left in defence to replace Goodes. Looking at:
S. Thompson - tough run home, but has the best average of the list.
N. Malceski - fairly consistent around the 85ppg mark, but might be a bit over priced given his large score 2 weeks ago.
T. McKenzie - pretty consistent around 90ppg with a relatively easy run home.
H. Taylor - plays quite a few at SS, but can score pretty low at times.
D. Heppell - not been great recently but usually good for 90 points.
M. Hibberd - consistently average lately with a good start to the year.

I am leaning towards McKenzie, but not really comfortable with that idea.

Thoughts and suggestions?

What about Enright scotty thomp can go big but does have tough run.Enright is soild 90-115 range McKenzie is also good i have him is pretty soild scorer 80-110 range has been getting manned up still getting alright scores.

 

[tripple1zero]

What about Enright scotty thomp can go big but does have tough run.Enright is soild 90-115 range McKenzie is also good i have him is pretty soild scorer 80-110 range has been getting manned up still getting alright scores.

Yeh didn't list Enright, another consistent option, priced between Malceski and McKenzie, but may possibly get rested in the lead up to finals?

 

[rocker_oz33]

Yeh didn't list Enright, another consistent option, priced between Malceski and McKenzie, but may possibly get rested in the lead up to finals?

He had the dees game off i hope thats hes only break.

 

[toxic]

Goddard, Hartlett, Shaw, Gibbs, Ibbotson, Goodes (Pittard, Clisby)

So one spot left in defence to replace Goodes. Looking at:
S. Thompson - tough run home, but has the best average of the list.
N. Malceski - fairly consistent around the 85ppg mark, but might be a bit over priced given his large score 2 weeks ago.
T. McKenzie - pretty consistent around 90ppg with a relatively easy run home.
H. Taylor - plays quite a few at SS, but can score pretty low at times.
D. Heppell - not been great recently but usually good for 90 points.
M. Hibberd - consistently average lately with a good start to the year.

I am leaning towards McKenzie, but not really comfortable with that idea.

Thoughts and suggestions?

Do u have Staker as a fwd? if so it could be fwd you bring in as Staker has a 5 game superior average to any of the names proposed.......

 

[tripple1zero]

Do u have Staker as a fwd? if so it could be fwd you bring in as Staker has a 5 game superior average to any of the names proposed.......

Yeh I have thought about this, and agree, given I would also get a better trade in (Roughead, Dusty). In two minds about it given my plans for my last 2 trades and maintaining team balance etc.

 

[FAILTOSUCCEED]

Yeh I have thought about this, and agree, given I would also get a better trade in (Roughead, Dusty). In two minds about it given my plans for my last 2 trades and maintaining team balance etc.

I still think Heppell has the highest ceiling out of them, due to his ability to find the ball as a mid.

Can be a tad inconsistent, but so are all of the options there.

If not, Enright next for me!