Aaaand there it is.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Hi kade's mum I hope your son gets drafted.
Not sure if anyone else saw it but the bloke on future stars with Hutchy is one of the people that helps figure out compensation for free agents that leave and he said they potentially have the power to give mid first round compensation, it doesn't have to be directly after their first pick or end of first round. That would be extremely good for us and could very well land us Mccartin at pick 4 which would be perfect!!
In applying the formula, an expert committee reviews the formula outcomes. The committee has the power to recommend alternative outcomes to GM – Football Operations where the formula produces a materially anomalous result.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Hope for Dees getting pick 9 for Frawley instead of 3 then?
Like IM said though, if 19 for Buddy isn't considered materially wrong then I am not hopeful with Frawley.
Yeah, but who's to say all information is available? I mean they don't necessarily draw a picture of how they arrive at the compo value and therefore 19 might have been the downgraded value after they decided pick 1* wasn't a fair payment to a club in Hawthorn's position.Hope for Dees getting pick 9 for Frawley instead of 3 then?
Like IM said though, if 19 for Buddy isn't considered materially wrong then I am not hopeful with Frawley.
I have witnessed all in action recently, and for what it's worth, my current assessment would be:
1 Andrews
2 Jackson
3 Uebergang.
"Ueber" has been the slider for me - I had him up there with "The Hammer" earlier in the season (on the back of some performances with the Lions Reserves), but his recent showings (for Redlands v Southport & QLD v Nth Ballarat) saw him lose ground (for mine).
Andrews impressed in the Gabba Curtain Raiser v Aspley recently, & again for QLD v Nth Ball. In the Nth Ball. game, he was sent forward late in the game and provided an excellent tall target up forward. He clunked several good marks and his strong presence freed up space for Hammelmann. Unfortunately, his set shot kicking let him down a little (from memory 1.3 from marks in fwd 50), but coupled with his earlier work in defence, overall a very good showing.
Jackson also played in the above two games and showed potential as a close marking defender - at the least showed that there is certainly something to work with.
I haven't given up on "Ueber", because he has some runs on the board, for mine, from earlier this year.
I think I also highlighted, earlier in this thread, someone I wasn't aware of prior to the QLD v Nth. Ball. game - Robert Blood. He caught my eye in that game, and I was interested to note that was named today for the State Combine Testing (although I was disappointed to find out he was from Southport - and therefore probably part of their Academy).
Just my "two bobs worth" (if you understand geriatric speak).
ps If you look closely enough you will see "Crusha the BS Recruiter" sitting on the far wing along with the Real Recruiters, looking very much the part.
Nice work Crusha, thank you have enjoyed all the clips. By the way, it was hard to pick you out without your horns.![]()
Yeah, but they don't deserve it though. I bet Melbourne offered a undervalued contract, in terms of money wise that would force Frawley into FA. They did not even put in the effect of convincing Frawley to stay, like Port did with Boak. This is a calculated move by them to get pick 3. That is what really annoys me. Last time I checked us, Port and Bulldogs were in a similar position and we are doing fine now, considering the lack of high draft picks in comprised drafts we had to endure through.Even if the Panel recommended Melbourne get a pick in 9-15 range the AFL would likely just say go with Pick 3, that way they get a sort of priority pick without the label on it.
Do you reckon he'd be worth a shot?Matt Panos seems certain to get another look this year. He has reinvented himself going from a slightly undersized KPF to an inside bull. He picked up the medal in the SANFL GF for Norwood on the weekend with 28 disposals and 12 clearances.
Plus been there done that, so he knows what it takes. Not as big a risk as an 18 year old.Yes. Big bodied inside ball winner who can go forward and be a real handful.
I think it all still comes down to the Frawley compensation.Just to put things back on track but the Saints have in some small way shown their hand I believe in picking Petracca at 1 with an article on AFL.com
Maybe, just maybe, McCartin could slide to us. Understand we would have already commited to some of our Acadmey players but we could really ensure our depth for talls (albeit developing) is fixed.
I think it all still comes down to the Frawley compensation.
...and I'm about 99% certain that the Dees will get the top compensation pick, because that way the AFL gets to help them out without being seen to help them out (again), obscured by their mystery compensation formula. Just smacks of how the AFL likes to go about things.Yeah :/