We won't get that straight out. If Redden and 5 come our way 30 will go there's at a minimum.
Out of interest if it were Redden that came down where would he fit in the hearts and minds of Pies fans? It's more to get a quick glance, but he would reach Luke Ball status very quickly in my eyes. The kids a gun!
Quality player. Lacks real class and polish and is more an accumulator of possessions than being real damaging but he has a red hot go and will quickly win the hearts of Pie fans. How we adopted Bally would be very similar for Redden.
This would be a death knell type deal. Brisbane will explore all other options before pulling the trigger on this. But they have to pull the trigger by Friday, we don't have to trade Beam$ at all or until Friday week.
Hoping I can add some thought and insight with this post. Personally, I would be devastated to lose Redden. Needless to say Beams is the better player. However, whilst saying that I would not incorporate Redden into the trade. The article has no substance to it IMO and is just throwing Redden's name there for the sake of it from my point of view. No source to suggest anything of substance.
I think that the clubs need to involve a third party. It is unlikely that either club will compromise. This makes the Greenwood option so logical to me. He replaces Beams immediately and you would get pick 5 and potentially later picks.
Both clubs are within their rights to be reluctant to part with a valuable member of their respective teams.
Hoping I can add some thought and insight with this post. Personally, I would be devastated to lose Redden. Needless to say Beams is the better player. However, whilst saying that I would not incorporate Redden into the trade. The article has no substance to it IMO and is just throwing Redden's name there for the sake of it from my point of view. No source to suggest anything of substance.
I think that the clubs need to involve a third party. It is unlikely that either club will compromise. This makes the Greenwood option so logical to me. He replaces Beams immediately and you would get pick 5 and potentially later picks.
Both clubs are within their rights to be reluctant to part with a valuable member of their respective teams.
Hoping I can add some thought and insight with this post. Personally, I would be devastated to lose Redden. Needless to say Beams is the better player. However, whilst saying that I would not incorporate Redden into the trade. The article has no substance to it IMO and is just throwing Redden's name there for the sake of it from my point of view. No source to suggest anything of substance.
I think that the clubs need to involve a third party. It is unlikely that either club will compromise. This makes the Greenwood option so logical to me. He replaces Beams immediately and you would get pick 5 and potentially later picks.
Both clubs are within their rights to be reluctant to part with a valuable member of their respective teams.
Hoping I can add some thought and insight with this post. Personally, I would be devastated to lose Redden. Needless to say Beams is the better player. However, whilst saying that I would not incorporate Redden into the trade. The article has no substance to it IMO and is just throwing Redden's name there for the sake of it from my point of view. No source to suggest anything of substance.
I think that the clubs need to involve a third party. It is unlikely that either club will compromise. This makes the Greenwood option so logical to me. He replaces Beams immediately and you would get pick 5 and potentially later picks.
Both clubs are within their rights to be reluctant to part with a valuable member of their respective teams.
Hoping I can add some thought and insight with this post. Personally, I would be devastated to lose Redden. Needless to say Beams is the better player. However, whilst saying that I would not incorporate Redden into the trade. The article has no substance to it IMO and is just throwing Redden's name there for the sake of it from my point of view. No source to suggest anything of substance.
I think that the clubs need to involve a third party. It is unlikely that either club will compromise. This makes the Greenwood option so logical to me. He replaces Beams immediately and you would get pick 5 and potentially later picks.
Both clubs are within their rights to be reluctant to part with a valuable member of their respective teams.
Right now as we speak the Collingwood football club is working on poaching one of your players. In the next few days one of your guys is going to ask to be traded.
Schwab will save face because he can say "the player requested it, if he hadn't we would not have let him go" and we will get our man.
What does it take to stop your supporters from being delusional. Everything has a price an in order to get it you pay the price.
We are not about to sell you a pristine BMW for 19.99
Hoping I can add some thought and insight with this post. Personally, I would be devastated to lose Redden. Needless to say Beams is the better player. However, whilst saying that I would not incorporate Redden into the trade. The article has no substance to it IMO and is just throwing Redden's name there for the sake of it from my point of view. No source to suggest anything of substance.
I think that the clubs need to involve a third party. It is unlikely that either club will compromise. This makes the Greenwood option so logical to me. He replaces Beams immediately and you would get pick 5 and potentially later picks.
Both clubs are within their rights to be reluctant to part with a valuable member of their respective teams.
Hoping I can add some thought and insight with this post. Personally, I would be devastated to lose Redden. Needless to say Beams is the better player. However, whilst saying that I would not incorporate Redden into the trade. The article has no substance to it IMO and is just throwing Redden's name there for the sake of it from my point of view. No source to suggest anything of substance.
I think that the clubs need to involve a third party. It is unlikely that either club will compromise. This makes the Greenwood option so logical to me. He replaces Beams immediately and you would get pick 5 and potentially later picks.
Both clubs are within their rights to be reluctant to part with a valuable member of their respective teams.
Hoping I can add some thought and insight with this post. Personally, I would be devastated to lose Redden. Needless to say Beams is the better player. However, whilst saying that I would not incorporate Redden into the trade. The article has no substance to it IMO and is just throwing Redden's name there for the sake of it from my point of view. No source to suggest anything of substance.
I think that the clubs need to involve a third party. It is unlikely that either club will compromise. This makes the Greenwood option so logical to me. He replaces Beams immediately and you would get pick 5 and potentially later picks.
Both clubs are within their rights to be reluctant to part with a valuable member of their respective teams.